James E. Bailey mac.com> writes:
>
> I don't understand this. Why aren't the last two eighth notes beamed
> together?
> \version "2.11.54"
> \relative { \clef bass << {e8 d d c d8 c } \\ { 4 g 4} >>
> }
>
I think the answer is found in a known issue in the beams section:
The same holds
Am 14.08.2008 um 23:28 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Daniel,
Under what circumstances would you want the upper part
to be a different voice from the one-voice part?
One case is when you want lyrics or dynamics (etc.) to be attached
to the lower part.
Hope this helps,
Kieren.
Or if you
Hi Daniel,
Under what circumstances would you want the upper part
to be a different voice from the one-voice part?
One case is when you want lyrics or dynamics (etc.) to be attached to
the lower part.
Hope this helps,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 05:31:27PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> If you care about the number of key strokes, why not add a short-hand,
> using a music
> function:
>
> \version "2.10.0"
> % Usage \split {upper music} { lower music }
> split = #(define-music-function (parser location upper lower
Am 14.08.2008 um 17:31 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
James E. Bailey wrote:
Am 14.08.2008 um 13:58 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Perhaps even better: don't use the \\ but explicitly
instantiate one of the voices
(related to a recent email discussion).
When I removed the \\, I got errors about clashi
James E. Bailey wrote:
Am 14.08.2008 um 13:58 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Perhaps even better: don't use the \\ but explicitly
instantiate one of the voices
(related to a recent email discussion).
When I removed the \\, I got errors about clashing columns. I'll
check into the explicit voice i
Am 14.08.2008 um 13:58 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Perhaps even better: don't use the \\ but explicitly
instantiate one of the voices
(related to a recent email discussion).
When I removed the \\, I got errors about clashing columns. I'll
check into the explicit voice instantiation thing. For
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Why not a \oneVoice, which gives the same result but lets LilyPond
automatically determine
the stem direction.
This works perfectly. Thanks!
Perhaps even better: don't use the \\ but explicitly
instantiate one of the voices
(related to a recent email discussion).
Whe
ley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mailinglist lilypond-user"
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: autobeams
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I would use your first solution, Jonathan, and simply
insert a \stemDown:
Why not a \oneVoice, which gives the same result but lets
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I would use your first solution, Jonathan, and simply
insert a \stemDown:
Why not a \oneVoice, which gives the same result but lets LilyPond
automatically determine
the stem direction. Perhaps even better: don't use the \\ but explicitly
instantiate one of the voices
(
Jonathan Kulp wrote Thursday, August 14, 2008 5:50 AM
I had a similar problem with an example I was working on for GDP
Rhythms, in Notation Reference 1.2.6.2. If you look at that example,
you can see that there's a whole series of 8ths that ought to be
autobeamed but are not. I couldn't eve
I had a similar problem with an example I was working on for GDP
Rhythms, in Notation Reference 1.2.6.2. If you look at that example,
you can see that there's a whole series of 8ths that ought to be
autobeamed but are not. I couldn't even make them beam properly
manually. I ended up sidestep
Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear lilypond-users,
how can I change the automatic beams for the triplets in this example?
I would like to beam the triplets in groups of three and I would like to do
it automatically.
Here the example:
\version "2.11.7"
{ \time 2/2 f'' 4 \times 2/3 { a'' 8 g'' f'' } \times
13 matches
Mail list logo