Excellent explanation and many thanks Jean (and apologies again Harm for
failing to understand the significance of the placement of the time and clef in
your suggestion).
I was indeed misunderstanding the significance of where I was placing the time
and clef expressions. I now have a better un
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Appoggiatura in bass clef at start of piece
Thanks, Harm,
Sorry, I seemed to have missed out the most important part of the challenge!
Apologies. This is a simplified extract of the lower staff from the start of a
two staff piano arrangement that
Le 27/10/2022 à 11:17, Peter Mitton a écrit :
Thanks, Harm,
Sorry, I seemed to have missed out the most important part of the
challenge! Apologies. This is a simplified extract of the lower staff
from the start of a two staff piano arrangement that requires 4 voices.
It’s the addition of the
Thanks, Harm,
Sorry, I seemed to have missed out the most important part of the challenge!
Apologies. This is a simplified extract of the lower staff from the start of a
two staff piano arrangement that requires 4 voices.
It’s the addition of the second voice that causes the additional treble c
Am Mi., 26. Okt. 2022 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb Peter Mitton :
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m wondering if there is a better way of writing this code:
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \new Staff {
> <<
> % \time 6/8
> % \clef bass
> \new Voice = "a" {
>
Hi Harm,
thank you for pointing me to that (and actually now I recall having seen
this hack some day).
Am 18.01.19 um 21:14 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
appoggiatura (or o
On 1/18/19, Thomas Morley wrote:
> you could try to use David K's cheat:
Neat! I’ve added it to the LSR, and also tagged it as doc:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1083
V.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/m
Hi Harm,
Thanks. I tend to adjust rest positions manually anyway, so that's not an
issue for me personally. With a bar full of notes it also usually looks
pretty good.
Andrew
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 12:20, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> Spacing is a little off. The R1 is not really centered:
>
>
___
Am Sa., 19. Jan. 2019 um 02:03 Uhr schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>
> Hi Harm,
>
> I have been using this heavily thanks to David K for a very long time.
> Although it may be a cheat, it works just fine. I see no drawbacks. What is
> the downside here?
Hi Andrew,
Spacing is a little off. The R1 is no
I should add that this works for grace notes also, which is actually what I
use the technique for.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Harm,
I have been using this heavily thanks to David K for a very long time.
Although it may be a cheat, it works just fine. I see no drawbacks. What is
the downside here?
Andrew
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> you could try to use David K's cheat:
>
> {
> R1
> %
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
> appoggiatura (or other grace notes) *before* the barline? I know that
> usually one is pointed to \afterGrace to achieve something like that but
> that seems semantic
Hi Mark and Aaron,
thanks for your suggestions. I'll go with Aaron's because a) it does'n't
rely on changing an unrelated element (the stem direction) and forces me
to deviate from the source and b) because it seems to surgically remove
the layout constraint that caused the issue.
Thanks
Urs
On 2019-01-14 4:08 am, Urs Liska wrote:
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A client requests me to shorten the slurs
Urs,
Forgot something
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\stemUp
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:08 AM
To: lilypond-user
Urs,
Perhaps
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:08 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: Appoggiatur
Encountering this bug for the first time is a right of passage. It will
probably not be fixed in our lifetimes.
Congratulations, you are now a Lilyponder!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/appoggiatura-problem-tp192328p192353.html
Sent from the User mailing
Many tahnks! Have understood the problem.
Regards
Am 07.07.2016 um 17:42 schrieb David Kastrup:
bb writes:
I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
that attached snippet you will find the appog
bb writes:
> I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
> appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
> that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time
> definition. in the second measure/bar it is not.
>
> There is also a
Luca,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Luca Danieli [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n178112...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello Lilypond-ers again!
>
> How can I write an appoggiatura, which goes into an acciaccatura, and then
> into the main note?
> More or less this is what I thought:
>
> appoggi
kli...@yahoo.com writes:
> David,
>
> Yes I like your approach much better. I had forgotten about the
> difference between using \times and using multiplication to show a
> tuplet.
>
> --John K
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:52 AM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>
>> Send
John Kliewe writes:
> Many thanks to the lilypond-user group for their advice on measure #47
> of the Chopin Nocturne #3 (Op 9 No 3). Urs' article on voices was
> particularly helpful.
>
> My next challenge appeared in measure #69. This is working for me :
>
> \version "2.16.0"
> \relative c'
> {
Le 03/06/2013 17:32, Mark Stephen Mrotek disait :
Good Day!
A piece begins with an anacrusis – see attached file “without.ly.” When
the “g” is notated as an appoggiatura to the “f” – see attached file
“with.ly” – some dreck appears.
Both hands don't have the same duration since one of them (R
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
>
> Don't know if this works in 2.16, but here you are:
>
>
>
> \version "2.17.14"
>
>
>
> treble = \relative c'' {
>
> \clef treble
>
> \time 3/4
>
> s2 g,8( a) |
>
> 2 4
>
> }
>
>
> bass = \relative c {
>
> \clef bass
>
> \time 3/4
>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running Ly 2.16.2 under Win7.
>
> I'm trying to reproduce the appoggiatura below. I've looked in the
> Notation Reference, the Snippet Repository, and the mailing list archives,
> and I haven't found anything that helps. Ca
2012/11/30 Noeck :
> Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
>> \version "2.17.6"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
>> \appoggiatura f8 fis,
>> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
>> \shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) Slur \appoggiatura f'8 fis,
>
Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
> \version "2.17.6"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
> \appoggiatura f8 fis,
> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
> \shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) Slur \appoggiatura f'8 fis,
\once \override Slur #'direc
On 30/11/12 09:32, David Kastrup wrote:
Nick Payne writes:
See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=777:
\version "2.17.6"
A rather new version.
shapeSlur = #(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
#{
\once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve of
>> I guess, perhaps I could just leave the slur "as is" in my original post and
>> just tweak the final output in Inkscape? No? Not ideal, but maybe?
>
> See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=777:
>
> \version "2.17.6"
>
> #(define ((alter-slur-curve offsets) grob)
> ;; get default control
David Kastrup wrote
> Nick Payne <
> nick.payne@.on
> > writes:
>
>> See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=777:
>>
>> \version "2.17.6"
>
> A rather new version.
>
>> shapeSlur = #(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
>> #{
>> \once \override Slur.control-point
Nick Payne writes:
> See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=777:
>
> \version "2.17.6"
A rather new version.
> shapeSlur = #(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
> #{
> \once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
> #})
And the above def
On 30/11/12 08:59, SoundsFromSound wrote:
shutterfreak wrote
Hi,
First, I suppose the last note in that 5/16 measure should be a fis8 and
not a fis4, otherwise the measure should last 9/16 and not 5/16.
I tried entering this in MuseScore. The default grace note gets no slur,
adding a slur with
shutterfreak wrote
> Hi,
>
> First, I suppose the last note in that 5/16 measure should be a fis8 and
> not a fis4, otherwise the measure should last 9/16 and not 5/16.
>
> I tried entering this in MuseScore. The default grace note gets no slur,
> adding a slur without modifying a thing yields th
Hi,
First, I suppose the last note in that 5/16 measure should be a fis8 and
not a fis4, otherwise the measure should last 9/16 and not 5/16.
I tried entering this in MuseScore. The default grace note gets no slur,
adding a slur without modifying a thing yields the result in measure 1,
inverting
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
>> the
>> note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
>> like
>> to move it to be above the notes.
>
> If you mean the
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
>> the
>> note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
>> like
>> to move it to be above the notes.
>
> If you mean the
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd like
to move it to be above the notes.
If you mean the slur, use \once \override Slur #'direction
Damn. Really should have seen that. Thanks.
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ wrote:
>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
>>
>> What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double
>> bar
>> line as the D#. What I wrote looks so
On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ wrote:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
>
> What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar
> line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the
> end). As you can see I've put the volta repea
Thank-you Carl
Adding a spacer to staff 2 solves the corrupt layout when two staves are
laid out.
However when I convert just staff 1, whose first quarter note has a
grace note, the resulting score displays a big distance between the
grace note and the quarter note, which is not good.
Note t
On 9/19/09 1:39 PM, "Nick Didkovsky" wrote:
> Hello James
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I assume the contents of staff 2 does
> not need to be altered depending on the contents of staff 1.
>
> Staff 2 simply contains:
> \time 4/4
> \clef treble
> R4*4
>
> How are you suggesting Sta
Hello James
Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I assume the contents of staff 2 does
not need to be altered depending on the contents of staff 1.
Staff 2 simply contains:
\time 4/4
\clef treble
R4*4
How are you suggesting Staff 2's content need be altered?
Thanks
Nick Didkovsky
James E. Bail
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although
ther
Stan Sanderson wrote:
On May 24, 2004, at 3:56 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2004 04.30, Stan Sanderson wrote:
Erik-
I'm looking for a workaround for another bug reported earlier.
Acciaccaturas before 32nd note runs apparently throw off the midi
timing.
This bug was added to our bug d
Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This could be considered a bug. You can, however, compare it to the following
> situation; and suddenly it's not so obvious what the expected behaviour would
> be:
> \notes <<
> \new Staff {
> r1 \clef bass r2
> }
>
Stan
On May 25, 2004, at 4:23 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Stan Sanderson wrote:
On May 24, 2004, at 3:56 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2004 04.30, Stan Sanderson wrote:
Erik-
I'm looking for a workaround for another bug reported earlier.
Acciaccaturas before 32nd note runs apparently th
On May 24, 2004, at 3:56 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2004 04.30, Stan Sanderson wrote:
Erik-
I'm looking for a workaround for another bug reported earlier.
Acciaccaturas before 32nd note runs apparently throw off the midi
timing.
This bug was added to our bug database (& you will be n
On Monday 24 May 2004 04.30, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> Erik-
>
> I'm looking for a workaround for another bug reported earlier.
> Acciaccaturas before 32nd note runs apparently throw off the midi
> timing.
This bug was added to our bug database (& you will be notified when it's
fixed). Since this i
On May 23, 2004, at 5:58 PM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 18.41, Julien Salort wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand why the following snippet does not give the desired
result.
I get two clefs one after the other...
This could be considered a bug. You can, however, compare it to the
follo
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 18.41, Julien Salort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand why the following snippet does not give the desired
> result.
> I get two clefs one after the other...
This could be considered a bug. You can, however, compare it to the following
situation; and suddenly it's not s
Will:
\appoggiatura a,8( fsharp'8\p) r fsharp2 e16[( d fsharp a]) |
(Bonus points for identifying what music it is!)
It's almost exactly a quote from "Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back"
(Han Solo's theme, I think), so I'm going to guess Richard Strauss...
Best wishes,
Kieren.
___
51 matches
Mail list logo
