On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Francisco Vila :
>
> > I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
> > git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
> >
> > James, what's the output of git --version?
>
> >From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ; has the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Francisco Vila :
>
> > I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
> > git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
> >
> > James, what's the output of git --version?
>
> From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ; has the h
2009/3/23 Francisco Vila :
> I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
> git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
>
> James, what's the output of git --version?
>From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ; has the hyphenated command been
deprecated? this form is still useful to invoke man page
2009/3/23 Carl D. Sorensen :
> git format-patch is what you type at the command line.
I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
James, what's the output of git --version?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
The incredible carnival of Badajoz
htt
On 3/23/09 6:25 AM, "James E. Bailey" wrote:
>>
>> Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to generate the patch;
>> otherwise, use diff -u to obtain a diff with context lines.
>>
>> --
>> Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
>>
>> The incredible carnival of Badajoz
>> http://www.flickr.com/
Am 23.03.2009 um 13:06 schrieb Francisco Vila:
2009/3/23 James E. Bailey :
Attached is my attempt to make a .diff. It's my first time, so if
I didn't
do it right, let me know. It's a learning process for me.
Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to generate the patch;
otherwise, use
2009/3/23 James E. Bailey :
> Attached is my attempt to make a .diff. It's my first time, so if I didn't
> do it right, let me know. It's a learning process for me.
Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to generate the patch;
otherwise, use diff -u to obtain a diff with context lines.
--
Am 17.03.2009 um 10:39 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Hi James
You wrote Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:00 AM
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, "James E. Bailey"
wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so th
Hi James
You wrote Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:00 AM
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, "James E. Bailey"
wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't
confused by
the issue. (I'v
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, "James E. Bailey"
wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't
confused by
the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, "James E. Bailey" wrote:
>
>
> On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
>>> the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
>>> last
>>> week)
>>
>> Yes, please do. C
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
last
week)
Yes, please do. Carl can help you get started as a Frog; we
desperately need more people writ
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:31:54AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
> I realise it's only been a week since this was last discussed, but:
> a) no one who can say whether or not this can be implemented has
> responded (ever)
Yes, this can be implemented.
I have no clue how complicated this may be,
El 06.03.2009, a las 10:51, Trevor Daniels escribió:
Yes, but I have lots of things on my to-do list and
little spare time available to do things, especially
things which might be invalidated shortly after.
Ah, I totally understand. I don't really want to make work that will
be for naught.
James E. Bailey wrote Friday, March 06, 2009 8:31 AM
I realise it's only been a week since this was last discussed,
but:
a) no one who can say whether or not this can be implemented has
responded (ever)
b) it's an open issue since apparently October. I just added it as
a user feature reques
I realise it's only been a week since this was last discussed, but:
a) no one who can say whether or not this can be implemented has
responded (ever)
b) it's an open issue since apparently October. I just added it as a
user feature request.
c) Can we just make the change so that more people ar
James
We discussed this last October, and I agreed to make the change in
2.13, but then the suggestion was made (by Mats):
Better yet, why can't the shorthand automatically "do the right
thing"? i.e.,
<< {} \\ {} >>
should be translated automagically into
<< {} \new Voice {} >>
I'
17 matches
Mail list logo
