On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 8:04 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> > Le 16/04/2022 16:55, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> >
> >
> > I have run into a LilyPond issue [1] where the accidental spacing is
> > wrong when there is a tie to the next measure. This is my tiny
> > example (and there's a good one in th
> Le 16/04/2022 16:55, Knute Snortum a écrit :
>
>
> I have run into a LilyPond issue [1] where the accidental spacing is
> wrong when there is a tie to the next measure. This is my tiny
> example (and there's a good one in the issue, too):
>
> %%%
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative {
> \clef
On 9/8/09 3:21 PM, "Torsten Anders" wrote:
> Hello Lilyponders,
>
> I am still looking for a way to avoid collisions of accidentals
> consisting of multiple signs. I searched various sources including the
> Internals Reference and finally came across the accidental slot/
> property X-extent (
Hi Torsten,
- What exactly does this pair of numbers mean? Why are there two
values to specify the width of a graphical object?
From the grob-interface doc page: "Each grob has a reference point
(a.k.a. parent): the position of a grob is stored relative to that
reference point."
Altho
Neil Puttock wrote:
2008/12/17 Jonathan Kulp :
I still want the a-sharp to appear in the 2nd measure, but don't want the
space occupied by the c-sharp. Using this "no-reset" workaround, the
a-sharp disappears, too. Is there a way to apply this style using \override
instead of "set"? if so th
2008/12/17 Jonathan Kulp :
> I still want the a-sharp to appear in the 2nd measure, but don't want the
> space occupied by the c-sharp. Using this "no-reset" workaround, the
> a-sharp disappears, too. Is there a way to apply this style using \override
> instead of "set"? if so then I could prob
Hi Jonathan,
This was promising but didn't solve the problem because it also made
the accidentals in the other voice disappear. Here's the context:
Maybe the modified snippet (included below) will solve your problem?
HTH,
Kieren.
%%
\version "2.11.65"
\new Staff \relative c'' {
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Jon,
2008/12/16 Jonathan Kulp :
Is there a way to make the invisible sharp symbol take up no space so that
the whole chord moves to the left where it ought to be?
There's a workaround for this mentioned in the bug tracker for issue #612.
Regards,
Neil
This was prom
Hi Jon,
2008/12/16 Jonathan Kulp :
> Is there a way to make the invisible sharp symbol take up no space so that
> the whole chord moves to the left where it ought to be?
There's a workaround for this mentioned in the bug tracker for issue #612.
Regards,
Neil
__
sorry ;p
Lilypond 2.11.13
hairpin minimum-length seems to work perfectly...
thank you again,
your are ... very reliable ^^
Yota
On 1/25/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please always tell what LilyPond version you use. When I try your
example with version 2.10.0, I certainly
get
Please always tell what LilyPond version you use. When I try your
example with version 2.10.0, I certainly
get an added spacing between the two notes.
However, if your main purpose is to get a longer hairpin, why not
follow the instructions in the section on Dynamics
in the manual:
\override V
On Sunday 26 October 2003 07:49 am, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> Hello, Graham:
> > Does it look very bad to you?
>
> Yes, I find it stands out as looking "sloppy".
>
> Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
> engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
I thought chromatic
Hello, Graham:
Does it look very bad to you?
Yes, I find it stands out as looking "sloppy".
Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
<>
Note how the top and bottom accidentals align (without touching), and
how much "cleaner" the re
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:35:56 -0400
Kieren Richard MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be running into a situation where accidentals are not
> spacing quite right.
>
> Here is the input:
> r | r
It looks good to me -- if you move the sharp over to be directly under
the natural sig
14 matches
Mail list logo
