Thanks, Kieren -
Yes. My mistake. Still didn't quite do what I'd hoped, though, even when I
corrected it.
All the best,
Ralph
__
Ralph Palmer
Seattle
USA
(he, him, his)
palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:42 PM wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Shouldn’t the d be 4. [not 4]?
>
> > bf
Thanks, William -
That helps a lot. Very close to the original.
On a side note (so to speak), I grew up in Olmsted Falls, and I have a
cousin who grew up in Oberlin. I spent a lot of time there.
All the best,
Ralph
__
Ralph Palmer
Seattle
USA
(he, him, his)
palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com
On We
Dear Ralph,
I think this replicates how the original score looks:
\version "2.25.7"
\relative b {
\clef alto
\time 4/4
\tuplet 6/4 { b2.:8 } c4.*2/3:8 d4.*2/3:8 | c2.*2/3:8 b4.*2/3:8 a4.*2/3:8
}
-William
On 3/6/24 21:53, Ralph Palmer wrote:
Hi -
Thanks for all your work and for your h
Hi Ralph,
Shouldn’t the d be 4. [not 4]?
bf2.:6 c4.:3 d4:3 |
Maybe I’m misunderstanding…?
Cheers,
Kieren.
