RE: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Timothy, Thank you, exactly what I wanted. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Lanfear Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 2:07 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: tie across voices On 23/12/2018

RE: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Jay, Beautiful, and it preserves the voice leading! Thank you! Mark From: Jay Anderson [mailto:horndud...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 3:11 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: tie across voices On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Jay Anderson
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Please see attached snippet. > > In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. > > I have looked at using transparent as given in > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 > > yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest. > My favor

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Timothy Lanfear
On 23/12/2018 21:35, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello, Please see attached snippet. In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. I have looked at using transparent as given in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest. Any suggestions would be g

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-12-23 1:35 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. I have looked at using transparent as given in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. It's not perfec

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-05 Thread David Kastrup
David Sumbler writes: > The automatic creation of contexts is obviously very useful, especially > when one is just a beginner at Lilypond.  But I almost wish that there > were an option to turn it off, which would be useful for forcing > oneself to understand how this all actually works! If ther

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-05 Thread David Sumbler
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > It seems that if, in a > > <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> > > passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music > > before > > the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterw

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct? Have

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread David Sumbler
On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > > > \new Staff { > >    \time 6/8 > >    << > >  { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > >    R2. | r4. e'''~ } > >

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread Knute Snortum
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:30 AM David Sumbler wrote: > \version "2.19.81" > > \new Staff { > \time 6/8 > << > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > R2. | r4. e'''~ } > \\ > { g''2.~ | g''~ } > >> > \oneVoice 2.~ | q | > } > > In the above I want the low

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-03 Thread David Kastrup
David Sumbler writes: > \version "2.19.81" > > \new Staff { >   \time 6/8  >   << > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 >   R2. | r4. e'''~ } > \\ > { g''2.~ | g''~ } >   >> >  \oneVoice 2.~ | q | > } > > In the above I want the lower note to be tied continuous

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-03 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi David, Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: \version "2.19.81" \new Staff {   \time 6/8   << { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10   R2. | r4. e'''~ } \\ { g''2.~ | g''~ }   >>  \oneVoice 2.~ | q | } One possibility would be: \version "2

RE: Tie across voices

2016-02-13 Thread Joseph N. Srednicki
Thanks, Nathan. Your solution worked perfectly. Joe Srednicki -Original Message- From: Nathan Ho [mailto:nat...@snappizz.com] Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:42 PM To: Joseph N. Srednicki Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; lilypond-user-bounces+nathan=snappizz@gnu.org Subject: Re: Tie

Re: Tie across voices

2016-02-12 Thread Nathan Ho
On 2016-02-12 15:37, Joseph N. Srednicki wrote: In the following three-beat example, I am trying to tie the upper-voice note in the second beat with the lower-voice note of the third beat. My example seems to work somewhat, but the notes of the upper and lower voices of the second and third beat