On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> \context implicitly instantiates a new context if the
>> one named doesn't yet exist, so \new is redundant, *except* where you
>> want multiple distinct contexts with the same name, or you're using
>> unnamed contexts (whi
On 8/16/08 2:41 AM, "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But, instead of doing reverse engineering all the time, shouldn't the
> core developers simply explain how did they coded \context and \new,
> when are they needed, what do they differ in, etc?
I believe that the docs started
2008/8/13 Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have found a place where \new is needed.
...
> everything works as it should. Apparently, in the first usage, the unnamed
> Staff context had been implicitly created and was unsuccessfully reused.
>
> Given this result, it appears to me that \new is
chubb.wattle.id.au> writes:
>
>
> I personally have *never* needed to use \new.
>
> \context implicitly instantiates a new context if the
> one named doesn't yet exist, so \new is redundant, *except* where you
> want multiple distinct contexts with the same name, or you're using
> unnamed c
I personally have *never* needed to use \new.
\context implicitly instantiates a new context if the
one named doesn't yet exist, so \new is redundant, *except* where you
want multiple distinct contexts with the same name, or you're using
unnamed contexts (which, internally, is the same thin
>> In the meantime, the distinction is explained in NR 5.1.2 Creating
>> contexts, although this section has not yet been reviewed in GDP so
>> maybe it could be improved. Let me know to what extent it helps
>> you. In any case I'll bear your comments in mind when I get to
>> that section.
Patric
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Patrick
My original intention was not to cover the use of \context in the LM,
but I see now that several of the examples and templates use it, so
that was perhaps a mistake. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll look
at it again.
In the meantime, the distinction is expl
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 08:50:51AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> In the meantime, the distinction is explained in NR 5.1.2 Creating
> contexts, although this section has not yet been reviewed in GDP so maybe
> it could be improved. Let me know to what extent it helps you. In any
> case I'll b
Patrick
My original intention was not to cover the use of \context in the LM, but I
see now that several of the examples and templates use it, so that was
perhaps a mistake. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll look at it again.
In the meantime, the distinction is explained in NR 5.1.2 Creati
Am 17.07.2008 um 22:35 schrieb Patrick Horgan:
I see many examples with \context, or \new used in the same place.
I've read LM 3.1.1 for example which tells me that if I don't create
explicitly a \new Staff or \new Voice, they will be created
automatically, and goes on to refer to that as
10 matches
Mail list logo
