Federico Bruni writes:
> 2013/12/8 Thomas Morley
>
>> 2013/12/5 Federico Bruni :
>>
>> > When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
>> > combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
>>
>> Hi Federico,
>>
>> How should this ever work?
>> Thinkin
2013/12/8 Thomas Morley
> 2013/12/5 Federico Bruni :
>
> > When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
> > combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
>
> Hi Federico,
>
> How should this ever work?
> Thinking of modulations/enhormonics.
>
Do y
2013/12/7 David Kastrup
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > It really depends on the music and kind of guitar.
> > Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in
> > fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques.
> > I know very few pieces for electric guitar which use alternate tunin
Federico Bruni writes:
> It really depends on the music and kind of guitar.
> Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in
> fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques.
> I know very few pieces for electric guitar which use alternate tunings
> (usually 6th string dropped down
2013/12/5 Federico Bruni :
> When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
> combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
Hi Federico,
How should this ever work?
Thinking of modulations/enhormonics.
-Harm
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> What I meant was: what is required for the a minimal first useful
> user experience. Would a hardcoded tuning do, so that we can
> implement a tuning choosing mechanism later?
>
>
yes, stringTunings = #guitar-tuning would be ok for most guitarists
> > It is quite
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>>> Can we do away with choosing the tuning, isn't there a common tuning
>>> for guitar that > 90% of guitars use?
>>
>> Can we do away with the command line, isn't there a common desktop
>> environment that >90% of computer users use?
>
> What I meant was: what is requi
David Kastrup writes:
>> Why enable editing the text input as long as it's next to useless
>> because it's slow and buggy? Your request is noted, though.
>
> "Next to useless" is O(1) of useful. Bugs get fewer and machines
> faster. Word for Windows became a success story ultimately.
What I me
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
>> Sure, but the thing is: why showing the text input if you cannot
>> modify it?
>
> Why enable editing the text input as long as it's next to useless
> because it's slow and buggy? Your request is noted, though.
"Next to useless" is O(1) of
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > I'm not a coder, so nothing.
> > I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my
> > computer.
>
> Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development
> is so slow the code is only available to th
Noeck writes:
> how do you generate the visual output?
Using LilyPond.
> Does this scale to larger scores?
It depends. Larger score support will need a lot of work. The first
thing is to get this project really started.
> Is there a possibility to compile line by line to get smaller changes
Federico Bruni writes:
> I'm not a coder, so nothing.
> I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my
> computer.
Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development
is so slow the code is only available to the actual developers for now.
> I see that t
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
> > source code anywhere.
> > Unfortunately we can test the demo only
>
> Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently.
> What would you do
… and another question: Can the Schikkers List code be found somewhere?
As there are quite some ideas coming up on the page linked below, it
would probably be interesting how Schikkers List solved some issues.
Cheers,
Joram
>> See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/284
__
Am 03.12.2013 17:46, schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans:
>> Federico Bruni writes:
>>
>>> I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi":
>>> input in the GUI, output text. :-)
>> So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
+1
> See https://github.com/wb
Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans:
Federico Bruni writes:
I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi":
input in the GUI, output text. :-)
So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/284
If any part of that rings a be
Federico Bruni writes:
> I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi":
> input in the GUI, output text. :-)
So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Federico Bruni writes:
> So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
> source code anywhere.
> Unfortunately we can test the demo only
Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently.
What would you do with the code?
> I did a quick test. Funny,
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3
> years
> > ago.
>
> Yes.
>
>
So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
source code anywhere.
Unfortunately we can test the demo only
Mark Knoop writes:
> There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are
> inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the
> selected clef.
Thanks!
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com
There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are
inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the
selected clef.
--
Mark Knoop
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
Federico Bruni writes:
> It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3 years
> ago.
Yes.
> The demo is not working on Chromium 31.0.1650.57
It was down. Please try again?
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com
2013/12/3 Noeck
> > This is *exactly* why I've been playing/experimenting with GUI
> > backends/frontends since 2004. If you haven't done so, please have
> > a look at Schikkers List
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/schikkers
>
> This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the html5 demo
Noeck writes:
>> http://lilypond.org/schikkers
>
> This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the html5 demo new,
> compared to last year? The last time I looked, it didn't work for me)
Thanks. I found some time this spring and it improved a lot. I haven't
had any time to work on
On Aug 20, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving
> feedback, like you :-)
Glad to help. :-)
>> One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of
>> this), is that selecting a different note duration from
Paul Morris writes:
> Nice progress on Schikkers list! It seems like it is coming along
> well.
Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving
feedback, like you :-)
> One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of
> this), is that selecting a different n
26 matches
Mail list logo
