On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> This prompted me to check my indexing and it was mostly OK, but I found that
> adding an index on RateUsername improves the speed of this query by a factor
> of about 4. I think we're back to pretty much OK now.
Yeah, previous delay was a bit
- Original Message -
From: Ramana Kumar
To: Trevor Daniels
Cc: Janek Warchol ; Devel ; Phil Holmes ; LilyPond User Group
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Regression test rater
Also if you want to give more details about your database, e.g., which SQL
implementatio
Also if you want to give more details about your database, e.g., which SQL
implementation, how the tables are organised, and the code you tried, maybe
someone here can improve it.
On Jul 10, 2012 4:54 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
> Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:03 PM
>
> > Kind-of
Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:03 PM
> Kind-of fixed. The way the files are presented is aimed at ensuring no-one
> rates a regtest more than once, and that they get the least-rated files
> presented to them in a random order. The only way I seem to be able to get
> this to work
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Janek Warchol"
Cc: "Devel" ; "LilyPond User Group"
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Regression test rater
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchol"
To:
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchol"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "LilyPond User Group" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Regression test rater
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
First of all,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> First of all, thanks to those who have spent time and energy rating the
> regression test at http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtests/ - we're very
> close to having a rating for all the tests.
[...]
"LilyPond Regression Test Rater
Well - b
