> Am 30.10.2020 um 12:24 schrieb Damien Garwood :
>
> So far, we have been using MIDI to hear our scores back, but since MIDI is an
> events-only system, does that accurately reflect how the score looks? For
> instance, articulations wouldn't be able to be replicated in MIDI, nor would
> the
> [...] I take it the "angle brackets" are the < and > symbols? The
> reason I ask is because screen readers often read these out as
> "less" and "greater".
Yes. The terminology is a bit unfortunate – indeed, “less than” and
“greater than” are the correct names for the ASCII characters < and >,
Hi Aaron,
Having no prior knowledge of print, please excuse me for asking, but I
take it the "angle brackets" are the < and > symbols? The reason I ask
is because screen readers often read these out as "less" and "greater".
That's one of the things that confused us - the fact that sometimes you
MIDI output from LilyPond is usually the way one would be able to listen to
their score.
While MusicXML can be converted *to* LilyPond, the reverse is not possible to
my knowledge. There is an open issue [2] filed requesting a MusicXML backend
to LilyPond, which would enable it to output
> After looking into several different score-writing software, I am
> now studying LilyPond to see how I could use it to produce music
> scores. [...]
>
> We have been making our way through the Learning Manual and are
> struggling with the concepts underlying the construction of chords,
> mult
On 2020-10-29 6:25 pm, Jenny Suchan wrote:
My name is Jenny Suchan, and I just joined this list yesterday. I am a
totally blind musician seriously pursuing a career in music
composition. After looking into several different score-writing
software, I am now studying LilyPond to see how I could use
