Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

David Kastrup wrote > I should think that using a large negative padding and/or > minimum-distance would create constant positions for the last system, at > the cost of potential overlaps/off-paper stuff. Yes, that's what I was looking for, David! Thanks a lot! Take care, Gilberto -- View this

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Kieren Kieren MacMillan wrote >> You are totally right, this works as expected (sorry, I read too quickly >> your first message and I swore you wrote ragged-last-bottom instead of >> last-bottom-spacing) > > I wrote both. =) Actually you did write "Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Gilberto Agostinho writes: > Hi Kieren, > > > Kieren MacMillan wrote >> This looks fine to me: >> >> [...] >> >> \paper { >> ragged-bottom = ##f >> last-bottom-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 0) (minimum-distance . 0) >> (padding . 0) (stretchability . 0)) >> } >> >> [...] >> >> What is th

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Gilberto, > You are totally right, this works as expected (sorry, I read too quickly > your first message and I swore you wrote ragged-last-bottom instead of > last-bottom-spacing) I wrote both. =) > I believe LilyPond is taking in consideration the distance > between the lowest grob, and no

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Kieren, Kieren MacMillan wrote > This looks fine to me: > > [...] > > \paper { > ragged-bottom = ##f > last-bottom-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 0) (minimum-distance . 0) > (padding . 0) (stretchability . 0)) > } > > [...] > > What is the problem you’re seeing? You are totally right,

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Gilberto, >> Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-bottom-spacing appropriately not >> work? > Not really. This looks fine to me: \version "2.18.2" \paper { ragged-bottom = ##f last-bottom-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 0) (minimum-distance . 0) (padding . 0) (stretchability . 0))

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Kieren Kieren MacMillan wrote > Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-bottom-spacing appropriately not > work? Not really. For instance, the PDF file I posted before here (the one produced by LilyPond, directly from the LSR) contains the line ragged-bottom = ##f in its \paper block. My gu

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Gilberto, Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-bottom-spacing appropriately not work? Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

For comparison, have a look on what Sibelius 7 does in the same situation: sib_example.pdf You will notice that the distance between last staff and the margin in the 1st page is different than the rest (I have no clue why and

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

Hi Pierre, Schneidy wrote > See http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=371 Thanks for your message, but unfortunately this is not exactly what I am looking for. Indeed this example expands the staves of a system throughout a page, but it still has different distances between the bottom staff and th

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

It's cool to have someone around with such a good and current knowledge of the LSR :-) Pierre Perol-Schneider schrieb am 22.04.2014: >2014-04-22 1:10 GMT+02:00 Gilberto Agostinho >: > >> Hello LilyPonders, >> > >Hi Gilberto, > > >> >> I am current writing a orchestral score with a lot of instrum

Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position

2014-04-22 1:10 GMT+02:00 Gilberto Agostinho : > Hello LilyPonders, > Hi Gilberto, > > I am current writing a orchestral score with a lot of instruments on it, > meaning that I will always have only a single system per page (no hidden > staves). The thing is, the distance between the bottom sta