Carl Sorensen-3 wrote
> (map (lambda (x) (cdr x)) (delete (list 'closepath) commandlist))
>
> should be able to be replaced by
>
> (map cdr (delete (list 'closepath) commandlist))
Yes indeed, good point!
Thanks,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Ne
On 10/31/13 8:36 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
>On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> I haven't tried to rewrite your code, but when I first learned Scheme I
>> was told that anytime you saw lots of set! expressions in the code, you
>> were trying to write procedural code (I.e. c)
On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I haven't tried to rewrite your code, but when I first learned Scheme I
> was told that anytime you saw lots of set! expressions in the code, you
> were trying to write procedural code (I.e. c) instead of functional code
> (Scheme). Your code
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote
> Cool idea!
Thanks!
>>- allow "unconnected" paths with multiple segments. (i.e. allow (r)moveto
>>in the middle of the path expression)
>
> Seems to allow simplification of complex stencils.
Indeed, it lets you put things where you want them in the first place, both
in r
Hi David N,
David Nalesnik-2 wrote
> Thank you for posting this!
>
> In the process of working on adding niente circles to Ferneyhough hairpins
> (Issue 3357), I noticed that these hairpins don't work with line breaks.
> (They are simply duplicated.) The routine which draws them uses
> make-co
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:48 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > In the process of working on adding niente circles to Ferneyhough
> hairpins
> > (Issue 3357), I noticed that these hairpins don't work with line breaks.
> > (They are simply duplicated.) The routine which draws them uses
> > make-conne
David Nalesnik writes:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>>
>> Eventually I could see a version of this making its way into LilyPond
>> (either alongside or as a replacement of "make-connected-path-stencil").
>>
>
> Thank you for posting this!
>
>
On 10/28/13 7:26 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>While working on a snippet for the "make-connected-path-stencil"
>function[1] I got to thinking about whether it would be possible to write
>a function that would have all of its benefits but none of its
>limitations. A function that woul
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
[...]
>
> Eventually I could see a version of this making its way into LilyPond
> (either alongside or as a replacement of "make-connected-path-stencil").
>
Thank you for posting this!
In the process of working on adding niente ci
