To me they look fishy. Their „Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen“ (kind of rules
applying to all contracts) seem to be contradictory as well. In one spot they
request to be given all rights except for the copyright and at another spot
they explicitly state it remains possible to publish elsewhere.
My 2 cents:
If not fishy it at least seems like a rip off. From the FAQ: as a composer
(arranger?) you get 5c +1c/per page per download or full view with the
exception that you get nothing, when you're featured composer of the day.
Just put in relation what you would charge if you'd sell the compos
I thank you both - my inexperience showing.
Regards.
Guy S
On 3/6/23 11:27 AM, Stephan Schöll wrote:
The business model Jean quoted looks like making money with
subscriptions with the publication of scores that are otherwise free,
without adding any value. There are many of them.
From a u
The business model Jean quoted looks like making money with
subscriptions with the publication of scores that are otherwise free,
without adding any value. There are many of them.
From a user's (director, ensemble) perspective: Why should I be a
paying member of musicalion.com if I find the score
Le lundi 06 mars 2023 à 10:43 -0600, Guy Stalnaker a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Curious if anyone on this list, especially in Germany, has knowledge or
> experience with musicalion.com. I just received an unsolicited email
> from them about my choral works on Choral Public Domain Library
>
