Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-22 Thread Matt Wallis
On 22/11/2017 16:33, David Kastrup wrote: You know: the minimal example would have been \midi { \time 4/4 } Nice minimalism! And I thought I'd done well to reduce the original 200+ lines in 4 files down to 13 in 1! and that would have saved adding a lot of other explanation: ... which shows my

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-22 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Matt Wallis writes: > >> Here is a small example: >> >>/opt/local/share/lilypond/2.19.80/scm/lily-library.scm:375:14: Wrong >>type argument in position 1 (expecting Context_mod): #f >> >> ... but works fine in 2.18.2 > > You know: the minimal example would have be

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-22 Thread David Kastrup
Matt Wallis writes: > Here is a small example: > >\include "english.ly" > >global = { >   \time 4/4 >   \tempo 4 = 96 >} >\score { >   \new Staff { >     \clef treble >     \global >     \relative c' { c1 } >   } >   \midi { \global } >} > > ...

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-22 Thread David Kastrup
Matt Wallis writes: > So I made experimental changes to the source until I found the cause > of the error. > Here is a small example: > >\include "english.ly" > >global = { >   \time 4/4 >   \tempo 4 = 96 >} >\score { >   \new Staff { >     \clef treble >     \

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-22 Thread Matt Wallis
On 17/11/2017 15:57, David Kastrup wrote: Matt Wallis writes: On 17/11/2017 14:15, David Kastrup wrote: There are no error messages referring to my own lilypond source files, which makes me wonder what's going on here. Your source is triggering an error in the library. Have you called conve

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
Matt Wallis writes: > On 17/11/2017 14:15, David Kastrup wrote: >>> There are no error messages referring to my own lilypond source files, >>> which makes me wonder what's going on here. >> Your source is triggering an error in the library. Have you called >> convert-ly -ed on your source in ord

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-17 Thread Matt Wallis
On 17/11/2017 14:15, David Kastrup wrote: There are no error messages referring to my own lilypond source files, which makes me wonder what's going on here. Your source is triggering an error in the library. Have you called convert-ly -ed on your source in order to upgrade its syntax? I under

Re: Moving from lilypond 2.18 to 2.19

2017-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
Matt Wallis writes: > Hi, > > Having seen that many here are using 2.19, I thought I'd have a go. I > use both Mac/OS and Linux, but what I'm describing here is for Mac/OS. > > I install lilypond via macports which provides two packages: > >lilypond @2.18.2_5 (textproc) >lilypond-devel @2