On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 7:10 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> You want to position the 'f' sign into the staff lines of the upper
> staff? If yes, then it doesn't fit with the concept of a a `Dynamics`
> context *between* the staves IMHO. Instead, I would attach the 'f'
> sign to the upper staff, s
> Interestingly, the following does *not* work, [...]
It's not clear to me how the end result should look like.
> The dynamics context doesn't know that there's a staff above it
> and/ot the piano staff forbids the dynamics from encroaching on the
> staff above.
You want to position the 'f' si
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 8:58 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Since version 2.25.13 the NR contains the attached warning box.
>
Thank you, Werner. Interestingly, the following does *not* work, but I can
kind of understand why. The dynamics context doesn't know that there's a
staff above it and/ot th
>> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's
>> > outside-staff-priority change where the forte goes? Isn't it
>> > DynamicText? If anyone can clear this up for me, I would be very
>> > appreciative.
>>
>> When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp,
>> they need
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:33 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> > change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear
> this
> > up for me, I would be very appreciative.
>
> When there are consecutive dyna
> So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear this
> up for me, I would be very appreciative.
When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp, they
need to be all vertically a
- Original Message -
From: "Eluze"
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Moving dynamics away from the staff
Phil Holmes wrote
Is there a way of shifting dynamics away from the staff when you're using
a
dynamics context?
have you tried
\overrid
Phil Holmes wrote
> Is there a way of shifting dynamics away from the staff when you're using
> a
> dynamics context?
have you tried
\override DynamicText.Y-offset = #-7
or
\override DynamicLineSpanner.Y-extent = #'(-1.5 . 11.5)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.10690
On 4/20/09 4:32 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer :
>
>> Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative
>> (not
>> note-relative) vertical position?
>
> Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can normalize its
> position by retriev
On 4/20/09 3:11 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
>
> Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative (not
> note-relative) vertical position?
Here's a hack that uses staff-padding together with a change in the Y-extent
that makes it work.
However, if you try to put
2009/4/20 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer :
>
>> Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative
>> (not
>> note-relative) vertical position?
>
> Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can normalize its
> position by retrieving the notehead's Y-of
2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative (not
> note-relative) vertical position?
Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can normalize its
position by retrieving the notehead's Y-offset:
dynamicsAllInside = #(define-mus
2007/12/18, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I always remove the old version first when upgrading,
> don't remember if it's strictly necessary but I think so.
Yes, on install it refuses to continue if it finds an older version installed.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.
Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear Gilles,
You wrote
You forgot to tell where to find this release. I's not linked from
any
public web page, but all old Windows releases are available at
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/
Thanks for Your tip! but one question:
Do I have to
Gilles THIBAULT wrote:
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
The 2.11.34 is very stable and works very well.
From this version (2.11.35, 2.11.36), some fonts problems in XP. (see
previous users messages)
You forgot to tell where to find this r
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
The 2.11.34 is very stable and works very well.
From this version (2.11.35, 2.11.36), some fonts problems in XP. (see
previous users messages)
Gilles.
___
lil
Daer Mats,
thank You. I've read Your e-mail and the text of the link and I think
I can understand the most much better and I was able to make the
changes I wanted.
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
Thanks
Stefan
Mats Bengtsson schrieb am 17.12.200
See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Fixing-overlapping-notation#Fixing-overlapping-notation
Note that LilyPond would have avoided these collisions itself, if you had
included the dynamics in the same Voice context that contains the notes that
cause the collisions. Howeve
Dear Mats,
sorry, I thought the information I gave was enough.
Below I woll quote the complete file.
The problem is:
I can't move the dynamic vertically.
I tried it with different contexts in the override commando, but
without any success. Ans the "crescendo" has now disappeared, I dont
know why.
H
If you tell what you want to achieve, it's much easier to
provide a relevant answer. Also, it helps if the example
code you include in your email can be compiled as it is.
However, as far as I can remember, there's no point in
specifying a padding value less than 0. Also, I hope you
have noticed
Which version of the manual have you been looking in?
In the section on Dynamics in the manual, you can find a working
example (at least in the manual for version 2.8).
/Mats
Stewart Holmes wrote:
Am I supposed to do something like this to move my dynamics down on
the page? This thing has me
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm sure that I've seen conversations on this subject recenly but I'll be
> darned if I can find it in the archives so sorry if I'm covering old ground.
>
> I have some dynamics (f, ff etc) which collide with slurs above and I want to
> move
22 matches
Mail list logo
