Re: Metronome marks above piano staff of vocal score?

2019-07-09 Thread Steven Smith
On 7/9/19 11:25 AM, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: Steven Smith wrote Is there a a way to have the metronome mark created by "\tempo 4=80" appear next to the piano staff as well as above the top staff of a SATB/Piano score? Hi Steven, The metronome marks are being created by the Metronome_mark_engr

Re: Metronome marks above piano staff of vocal score?

2019-07-09 Thread Steven Smith
On 7/9/19 11:18 AM, Malte Meyn wrote: Am 09.07.19 um 18:52 schrieb Steven Smith: Is there a a way to have the metronome mark created by "\tempo 4=80" appear next to the piano staff as well as above the top staff of a SATB/Piano score? My research indicates that this placement is fairly comm

Re: Metronome marks above piano staff of vocal score?

2019-07-09 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Steven Smith wrote > Is there a a way to have the metronome mark created by "\tempo 4=80" > appear next to the piano staff as well as above the top staff of a > SATB/Piano score? Hi Steven, The metronome marks are being created by the Metronome_mark_engraver. This engraver, by default, "lives

Re: Metronome marks above piano staff of vocal score?

2019-07-09 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 09.07.19 um 18:52 schrieb Steven Smith: Is there a a way to have the metronome mark created by "\tempo 4=80" appear next to the piano staff as well as above the top staff of a SATB/Piano score? My research indicates that this placement is fairly common in choral pieces. Also, some submissi

Re: Metronome Marks above a StaffGroup

2012-01-07 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, > It is not (currently) possible to move the "Mark_engraver" or the > "Metronome_mark_engraver" to the StaffGroup level. I'm writing a bug > report about this. It will be great to have this feature… > You can add it to the first Staff of your StaffGroup . The drawback is > that there w

Re: Metronome Marks above a StaffGroup

2012-01-07 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 7 January 2012 18:21, Andrew C. Smith wrote: > Hey everyone, > > On larger orchestral scores a metronome mark will appear at the top > of each staff group (like strings, winds, brass, etc.) Is there a way > to achieve this in Lilypond? > > I've tried removing Staff_collecting_engraver and Metro

Re: metronome marks suppression again

2010-09-05 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 5 September 2010 02:39, michael webster wrote: > > howdy all - a refinement to my question. > > yes indeed, setting Score.tempoHideNote = ##f will force lily to > display redundant makings like \tempo 4 = 80. > > but is there also a way to force lily to show redundant tempo markups > like this

Re: metronome marks suppression again

2010-09-04 Thread Neil Puttock
On 5 September 2010 01:39, michael webster wrote: > yes indeed, setting Score.tempoHideNote = ##f will force lily to display > redundant makings like \tempo 4 = 80. > > but is there also a way to force lily to show redundant tempo markups like > this one?: Try adding \null to the end of the se

Re: Metronome marks - range of tempo

2008-05-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:20:32 -0700 (PDT) George_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if it were possible to create a normal metronome > marking for a piece of music, but instead of having only a concrete > tempo, if it were possible to create a mark that signified a range, > for example,

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-15 Thread Neil Puttock
On 15/04/2008, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please add it to input/new/, then. That's exactly what it's for, > and this way it'll appear in the lilypond Snippet lists. Also, > this gives us a nice collection of items to add when LSR moves to > 2.11. Fair enough. I'll delete t

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-15 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
On 15/04/2008, Neil Puttock wrote: > I've taken the liberty of adding your snippet to the LSR as "Creating > simultaneous rehearsal marks". Like Alexander's snippet, it works > better under 2.11, so it's also waiting for an LSR version change. That's fine. > I've removed the extra-spacing-wi

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-14 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:42:40 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope you don't mind, but I've added your snippet to the LSR as > "Adding a text indication to metronome marks". Unfortunately, it > doesn't work under 2.10, so it's waiting for LSR to move to 2.11 (and > the nod from

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-14 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Risto, On 12/04/2008, Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/04/2008, Alexander Kobel wrote: > > > I think there's another drawback of the snippet. > > I had a very similar problem, trying to add marks like "Moderato (* = > > 63)", yet using rehearsal marks at the same time f

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-14 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Alexander, On 11/04/2008, Alexander Kobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there's another drawback of the snippet. > I had a very similar problem, trying to add marks like "Moderato (* = > 63)", yet using rehearsal marks at the same time for sectioning the piece. > Problem is, Lily ca

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-12 Thread Alexander Kobel
Risto Vääräniemi wrote: On 12/04/2008, Alexander Kobel wrote: I think there's another drawback of the snippet. I had a very similar problem, trying to add marks like "Moderato (* = 63)", yet using rehearsal marks at the same time for sectioning the piece. Problem is, Lily can't handle two R

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I got around the simultaneous RehearsalMark limitation by using > invisible measures. My dirty trick is attached below. Apparently a piece for very aged people only :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.g

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-12 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
On 12/04/2008, Alexander Kobel wrote: > I think there's another drawback of the snippet. > I had a very similar problem, trying to add marks like "Moderato (* = > 63)", yet using rehearsal marks at the same time for sectioning the piece. > Problem is, Lily can't handle two RehearsalMark events

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-11 Thread Alexander Kobel
Risto Vääräniemi wrote: On 08/04/2008, Trevor Daniels wrote: The snippet 204 doesn't work very well with 2.11 because it uses negative padding to position the rhythm mark closer to the staff and that's not supported by 2.11. I think there's another drawback of the snippet. I had a very similar

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-10 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
On 08/04/2008, Trevor Daniels wrote: > It's possible (most things are in LilyPond) but it's not easy (at least I > don't know an easy way). Essentially you have to create a tiny score > without a staff, etc. Have a look at > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=204 > This should give you some

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-09 Thread Ole Schmidt
Hi Matthias, see the snippet below, there is also a snippet in the lsr, but I can't find it... \version "2.10.15" \new Staff { \time 4/4 \override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'() \relative c'{ c4^\markup { { \score {\new Staff \with { \remove "Time_signature_engraver" \remove "Clef_e

Re: Metronome marks

2008-04-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Hi Mattias It's possible (most things are in LilyPond) but it's not easy (at least I don't know an easy way). Essentially you have to create a tiny score without a staff, etc. Have a look at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=204 This should give you some clues, or maybe easier, you can sim

Re: Metronome marks

2003-12-10 Thread Mats Bengtsson
See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-12/msg00013.html for an example on how to design your own layout for a metronome mark using the text markup features. The +- sign can be typeset using embedded LaTeX in the text string: " = $\\pm$ 48". /Mats Atte André Jensen wrote: Hi I'