On 22-02-16 04:05, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 22:12:51 (+0100), Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 21.02.2016 um 22:02 schrieb David Wright:
On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 19:10:29 (+0100), Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Thanks a lot. Sorted now using sudo sh lilypond...
I can't help wondering what the ... s
Late to the party, but most Linux distros will allow you to add
repositories/packages for more-recent versions: on gentoo, you can even use
a "live" version that installs from git. This has the occasional
consequence of lilypond reporting itself as a version that isn't officially
released yet. So i
On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 22:12:51 (+0100), Malte Meyn wrote:
> Am 21.02.2016 um 22:02 schrieb David Wright:
> >On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 19:10:29 (+0100), Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> >>Thanks a lot. Sorted now using sudo sh lilypond...
> >
> >I can't help wondering what the ... stands for.
> >
> It’s the ins
Am 21.02.2016 um 22:02 schrieb David Wright:
On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 19:10:29 (+0100), Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Thanks a lot. Sorted now using sudo sh lilypond...
I can't help wondering what the ... stands for.
It’s the install script, something like
lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh
___
On Sun 21 Feb 2016 at 19:10:29 (+0100), Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Thanks a lot. Sorted now using sudo sh lilypond...
I can't help wondering what the ... stands for.
> On 21-02-16 13:13, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When I install lilypond on Ubuntu (following the instructions on
> >the web
Thanks a lot. Sorted now using sudo sh lilypond...
On 21-02-16 13:13, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Hi,
When I install lilypond on Ubuntu (following the instructions on the
website i.e.
cd PATH-TO-DOWNLOAD-DIRECTORY
sh lilypond-2.18.2-OS-TYPE.sh
)
it installs two folders in my home directory, lilyp
Greetings Peter,
When I install LilyPond, I use the --prefix flag and direct it to be
installed in folder /usr/ In this way, the bin files will be created
in the proper places. The "down side" is that the directories of the
.el files and .info files will need to be explicitly stated somewhere
in o
On 21.02.2016 13:18, Jean Bréfort wrote:
Why don't you directly use the lilypond package?
sudo apt-get install lilypond
You might end up with a more or less old LilyPond version.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As Jean suggests, use apt-get if you are allowed to, you'll need to be
root. If you have to install the package without privilege, then
~/bin seems pretty normal. Many users will have a ~/bin directory
with it entered on their $PATH where they c
Am 21.02.2016 um 13:21 schrieb Malte Meyn:
You should either install as root (using sudo):
cd PATH-TO-DOWNLOAD-DIRECTORY
sudo sh lilypond-2.18.2-OS-TYPE.sh
Advantage: You (and all other users) can start lilypond directly from
terminal etc. without changing PATH/make it known to Frescobaldi
Am 21.02.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Why don't you directly use the lilypond package?
sudo apt-get install lilypond
The installation would be clean.
This only works for packaged LilyPond versions ;)
Le dimanche 21 février 2016 à 13:13 +0100, Peter O'Doherty a écrit :
cd PATH-TO-DOW
Hi,
Why don't you directly use the lilypond package?
sudo apt-get install lilypond
The installation would be clean.
Hope this helps,
Jean
Le dimanche 21 février 2016 à 13:13 +0100, Peter O'Doherty a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> When I install lilypond on Ubuntu (following the instructions on the
> websi
12 matches
Mail list logo
