Concerning LTS ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus) and 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) do
not offer LTS and never had! As I used it , I had no problems but never
got frescobaldi 3.0.0 running. It did not work on "16" either!
Obviously "17" is a version "in between" the LTS releases.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Rele
Hi Simon,
Well, 16.04 is a long term support (LTS) release which companies seem to
like.
But there is nothing wrong therefore with 17.10. I find it to be really
stable and trouble free, and superior in may ways - else why would they
release it?.
Still cant get Frescobaldi 3 running on it, but I
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 09:11:58 (-0500), Ben wrote:
> On 12/9/2017 9:03 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> >
> >>However, weren't you one of those who "enjoyed" the fun of a
> >>major version update? ;-)
> >
> >Yes, I was. But I think I know how to avoid that ‘fun’ in future:
> >having a separate home part
On 12/9/2017 9:03 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
However, weren't you one of those who "enjoyed" the fun of a major
version update? ;-)
Yes, I was. But I think I know how to avoid that ‘fun’ in future:
having a separate home partition now, I’d just overwrite the old
version and install the new o
On 09.12.2017 09:22, Urs Liska wrote:
Until now I’ve stuck to my resolve to not open that can of potential
problems coming with less stable Ubuntu versions. How much of a risk is
there?
In general or specifically for LilyPond?
Frescobaldi has the discussed issue,*compiling* LilyPond is pretty
I am just jumping into that thread and have not read the rest of the
conversation.
I did not get to run frescobaldi 3.0.0 on my Linux mate 17.04,
python-ly did not work which version ever i tried. I installed Linux
mint 18.2 Sonja 64 bit a couple of weeks ago and gave frescobaldi 3.0.0
another
> Until now I’ve stuck to my resolve to not open that can of potential
> problems coming with less stable Ubuntu versions. How much of a risk is
> there?
Hi Simon,
I had small issues (like this Frescobaldi one, not working switch user,
some missing icons for non-gnome applications) with almost an
Am 9. Dezember 2017 09:17:21 MEZ schrieb Simon Albrecht
:
>On 09.12.2017 00:56, Noeck wrote:
>>> I'm not too familiar with Ubuntu's update path, but is it possible
>for
>>> you to upgrade to 17.04 - maybe the poppler issue has been resolved
>in
>>> later releases? Just an idea for testing. If yo
On 09.12.2017 00:56, Noeck wrote:
I'm not too familiar with Ubuntu's update path, but is it possible for
you to upgrade to 17.04 - maybe the poppler issue has been resolved in
later releases? Just an idea for testing. If you're not wanting to leave
your older-but-stable OS, I totally understand.