Hi,
On 2025-03-18 at 10:38 -0400, Saul Tobin wrote:
Thank you very much for your responses! I believe these will help me to
proceed.
--
Aura
>
> I got inclusion of the original init file working with the following code.
> IMHO it feels like a very crude hack. Is there a scheme function that would
> include a LilyPond file in the current context?
>
> Code:
>
> $(ly:parser-include-string
> (format #f "\\include \"~a\""
>(string-appe
On 18/03/2025 10:07, Aura Kelloniemi wrote:
his probably is already possible without any changes to LilyPond (using
top-repl). Is there a Scheme function that takes an arbitrary LilyPond
expression as a string, parses it and returns a music/score/book object?
I'm not an expert of this topic, but
Hello Hans,
On 2025-03-17 at 18:28 +0100, Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 17 Mar 2025, at 11:01, Aura Kelloniemi wrote:
> > I am developing a tool for processing musical notation in Haskell.
> In my experience, it is hard to work with source code directly, because of
> the difficulty to pin down de
Hi,
On 2025-03-17 at 12:43 -0400, Saul Tobin wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to look at your code. Your project sounds
> interesting – I'll try to make some time.
It is in very early stages of development. I need to get LilyPond import
working first and then see how I will represent music expr
> On 17 Mar 2025, at 21:54, Immanuel Litzroth
> wrote:
>
> ghc has a FFI for C and C++ can be made to generate C compatible code.
> There is no way to use a C++ library in another runtime without writing a
> big chunk of glue code.
I wrote a C++ wrapper for the Guile C interface, but I do not
ghc has a FFI for C and C++ can be made to generate C compatible code.
There is no way to use a C++ library in another runtime without writing a
big chunk of glue code.
Immanuel
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:31 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 17 Mar 2025, at 11:01, Aura Kelloniemi wrote:
> >
> > I am
> On 17 Mar 2025, at 11:01, Aura Kelloniemi wrote:
>
> I am developing a tool for processing musical notation in Haskell. I want to
> be able to import LilyPond scores and as I don't want to parse LilyPond's
> surface syntax and write a Scheme interpreter, I have decided to export
> LilyPond sc
Hi Aura,
I haven't had a chance to look at your code. Your project sounds
interesting – I'll try to make some time.
The exporter writes output to stdout.
>
> I have a few questions/problems:
>
> 1) First of all, is this a good strategy at all or would there be a better
> way
> to make LilyPond ru
