Re: Cross-staffs where a note is already displaced

2017-06-15 Thread David Wright
On Thu 15 Jun 2017 at 00:30:44 (+0200), Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-06-14 18:58 GMT+02:00 David Wright : > > > > Would I be right in thinking it searches through the grobs for > > this moment, finds out if any have been displaced, and returns > > the displacement? > > Actually, all Stem-grobs are

Re: Cross-staffs where a note is already displaced

2017-06-14 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-06-14 18:58 GMT+02:00 David Wright : > On Mon 12 Jun 2017 at 09:17:31 (+0200), Thomas Morley wrote: >> 2017-06-12 6:43 GMT+02:00 David Wright : >> > I can't figure out how to make crossStaff work when one component >> > has been displaced by the interval of a second. I came up with a >> > hack

Re: Cross-staffs where a note is already displaced

2017-06-14 Thread David Wright
On Mon 12 Jun 2017 at 09:17:31 (+0200), Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-06-12 6:43 GMT+02:00 David Wright : > > I can't figure out how to make crossStaff work when one component > > has been displaced by the interval of a second. I came up with a > > hack (a hidden note) in example 3, but it has the si

Re: Cross-staffs where a note is already displaced

2017-06-12 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-06-12 6:43 GMT+02:00 David Wright : > I can't figure out how to make crossStaff work when one component > has been displaced by the interval of a second. I came up with a > hack (a hidden note) in example 3, but it has the side effect of > leaving the accidental (when there is one) rather far