... so works more as a function than as a literal output graphic.
PMA wrote:
as i see it, the bracket -- whether '[' or ']' - modifies the note on
it's left.
Marc Schonbrun wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax
parser to view beaming groups as fol
as i see it, the bracket -- whether '[' or ']' - modifies the note on
it's left.
Marc Schonbrun wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax parser to
view beaming groups as follows:
}
\relative {
c8 d [e f g a b c]
}
The above snippet beams from the
No problem. :)
Regards,
Michael Morales,
thenewmikemo...@aol.com
On 9/6/2010 10:06 PM, Marc Schonbrun wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Michael wrote:
What I've normally done to make it clear is place the [ bracket directly after
the first d. See below.
\relative c' {
c8 d[ e f g a b c]
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> "Marc" == Marc Schonbrun writes:
>
> Marc> Hello, I was wondering about why the decision was made in the
> Marc> input syntax parser to view beaming groups as follows:
>
>
> Marc> \relative { c8 d [e f g a b c] }
>
> Marc> The above snipp
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Michael wrote:
> What I've normally done to make it clear is place the [ bracket directly
> after the first d. See below.
>
> \relative c' {
> c8 d[ e f g a b c]
> }
>
> I feel this helps the clarity of the code, but this is what I do, I'm unsure
> of anyone else.
> "Marc" == Marc Schonbrun writes:
Marc> Hello, I was wondering about why the decision was made in the
Marc> input syntax parser to view beaming groups as follows:
Marc> \relative { c8 d [e f g a b c] }
Marc> The above snippet beams from the d through to the final c. At
Marc> first glance,
