Re: Compiling Lilypond-2.6.0 On Gentoo

2005-07-02 Thread J. Scott Amort
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 21:59 -0700, Daniel Johnson wrote: > If you are going to be building the documentation on Gentoo (i.e. you > have "doc" in your USE variable) it is almost imperative that you use a > version of Guile newer than the latest stable -- use a CVS snapshot of > the development branc

Re: Compiling Lilypond-2.6.0 On Gentoo

2005-07-01 Thread Daniel Johnson
If you are going to be building the documentation on Gentoo (i.e. you have "doc" in your USE variable) it is almost imperative that you use a version of Guile newer than the latest stable -- use a CVS snapshot of the development branch, and you get Han-Wen's garbage-collection patches. What I woun

Re: Compiling Lilypond-2.6.0 On Gentoo

2005-07-01 Thread Scott Amort
Joe Neeman wrote: If this list allows .tar.bz2 attachments, you could try unpacking the attachment into your $PORTDIR_OVERLAY directory. It adds ebuilds for the correct versions of mftrace and fontforge, so it should help resolve any dependency problems. Joe Hi Joe, Thanks for taking the time

Re: Compiling Lilypond-2.6.0 On Gentoo

2005-07-01 Thread Joe Neeman
If this list allows .tar.bz2 attachments, you could try unpacking the attachment into your $PORTDIR_OVERLAY directory. It adds ebuilds for the correct versions of mftrace and fontforge, so it should help resolve any dependency problems. Joe lilypond-ebuild.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data __