Re: Beams over rests

2021-10-01 Thread Paul Hodges
Thanks - adjusting the Stem.details.beamed-length as required did the job, though as you say it requires adjustment for each individual case. So I gritted my teeth and did it - there were 54 instances (less than I would have guessed actually), so it was quite manageable. To my surprise, mostly

Re: Beams over rests

2021-09-28 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Paul, I'm sure you know of the override pair: \override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.5 \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(4.75) ( music with beamed rests here ) \revert Stem.stemlet-length \revert Stem.details.beamed-lengths I'm not aware of any way to set this globally. Well, the first o

Re: Beams over rests and concaveness

2020-01-23 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
Hi Carl, Thank you so much for the reply, I will report this in the bugs subforum. Also, thanks for the workaround, I will use it for the moment being. Best, Gilberto -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Beams over rests and concaveness

2020-01-23 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/23/20, 7:48 AM, "Gilberto Agostinho" wrote: Hi everyone, It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests, in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marke

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-30 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, for me it works as expected on 2.15.2. Strange... Am 30.06.2011 03:42, schrieb Edward Neeman: Hello, In this example (taken from the Documentation page, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-30 Thread James Lowe
Hello. On 30 Jun 2011, at 06:34, "Keith OHara" wrote: > Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes: > >> Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu >> 11.04 > > I made a bug-list entry > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718 I think you meant http://code.goo

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Nick Payne
On 30/06/11 11:42, Edward Neeman wrote: Hello, In this example (taken from the Documentation page, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? Thanks, Edward

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Keith OHara
Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes: > Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu > 11.04 I made a bug-list entry http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718 Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes: > If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value greater than 0, > th

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-06-29 08:48 PM, Keith OHara wrote: Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes: beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? \version "2.14.1" \relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r } Uh oh. It works perfectly

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Edward Neeman
Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.14.1 and MacOSX 10.5.8. If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value greater than 0, then the beam looks like it should. Thanks, Edward On 6/30/11 9:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: Edward Neeman gmail.com> writ

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Keith (and Edward), > Could you, or anybody else who gets the bad output, post > which Lilypond version and which operating system you use? Doesn't work here… 2.15.1-1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7. Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: beams over rests

2011-06-29 Thread Keith OHara
Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes: > beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right.  How can I get it to > look like it does in the documentation? > \version "2.14.1" > \relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r } Uh oh. It works perfectly for me with 2.14.0, giving a beam exten