>> The Alain and Rachmaninov only have one fewer beam, so the beam
>> count between the groups is not appropriate for the lengths of the
>> subdivided groups, according to the Gould rules. Personally, I
>> think the Gould rules are correct, but two of the music publishers
>> in your example do no
On 04.07.24 19:00, Carl Sorensen wrote:
The Alain and Rachmaninov only have one fewer beam, so the beam count
between the groups is not appropriate for the lengths of the
subdivided groups, according to the Gould rules. Personally, I think
the Gould rules are correct, but two of the music publ
On 2024-07-04 09:09, Jason Yip - sripedia_getpgrp(a)slmail.me wrote:
On 2024-07-03 22:06, Werner LEMBERG - wl(a)gnu.org wrote:
Even though you want this special subdivision at just one point in
your example, do you have examples where this special subdivision
occurs at multiple points in the sam
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:07 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> OK, here are some scans that I've found. As you can see, this kind of
> subdivision is not so special as previously assumed.
>
> * Jehan Alain, trois danses – Deuils (for organ), (publisher: Leduc)
>
> * Prokofiev, piano sonata 7, op. 83,
On 2024-07-03 22:06, Werner LEMBERG - wl(a)gnu.org wrote:
Even though you want this special subdivision at just one point in
your example, do you have examples where this special subdivision
occurs at multiple points in the same beam? My former suggestion
acts as a offset of # of beamlets for eve
> I have thought of a probably better solution. Currently, if
> `minimumBeamSubdivisionInterval` > `maximumBeamSubdivisionInterval`,
> the algorithm basically pretends that `subdivideBeams` is false.
> What if I change the behavior of that case such that you can add
> `maximumBeamSubdivisionInterv
> This may be slightly less ugly, but it still requires a function
> call every place you want a beam subdivision:
Thanks!
Werner
On 2024-07-02 21:33, Werner LEMBERG - wl(a)gnu.org wrote:
My beam subdivision algorithm tries to strictly respect metric
values as subdivision is intended to ease readers' track of the
current measure position. Adding features that loosen that
strictness such as one to support your desired output
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 10:48 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
> how can I easily create a beam subdivision as shown in the attached
> image using the current development version 2.25.18? The solution I
> came up with is extremely ugly...
>
>
> Werner
>
> This may be slightly less ugly
> My reading would be
>
> \version "2.24.3"
> \relative c'' {
> d4 r16 f d b g'4~ g16 a c a64 (g fis g) |
> }
>
> It corrects only one beaming "error", is more rhythmically
> consistent, and might be more in keeping with the context.
Thanks, but I'm not typesetting the sonata :-) It would be
ge-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Werner LEMBERG
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 9:33 PM
To: sripedia_getp...@slmail.me
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: beam subdivision problem
Hello Jason,
> > ```
> > {
> &g
Hello Jason,
> > ```
> > {
> > \once \set subdivideBeams = ##t
> > \once \set minimumBeamSubdivisionInterval = \musicLength 8
> > f'16 f'32
> > \set stemRightBeamCount = 2
> > f'
> > \set stemLeftBeamCount = 2
> >f' f' f' f'
> > }
> > ```
>
> Looks
Replying from my current email address since the one you cc'd me is
abandoned, wish I could update the git commits' email addresses without
breaking changes haha.
On 2024-07-02 09:47, Werner LEMBERG 'wl at gnu.org' wrote:
``` { \once \set subdivideBeams = ##t \once \set
minimumBeamSubdivisionI
Trevor,
Thanks! Indeed lilypond is not doing the right thing, and needs to be
adjustable by the user in this aspect.
I can do it the original way with explicit beam control, so there is a
solution. It’s just very tedious and error prone - when there are several
hundred of these in the score I
2015-03-10 22:29 GMT+01:00 Trevor Daniels :
> tisimst wrote Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:52 PM
>
>> The other question the OP was asking is can
>> the group default to have TWO full beams
>> across the group, ...
>> I had a look through the IR and couldn't find
>> anything that says it will only use a
tisimst wrote Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:52 PM
> The other question the OP was asking is can
> the group default to have TWO full beams
> across the group, ...
> I had a look through the IR and couldn't find
> anything that says it will only use a SINGLE
> beam across the whole group.
The sni
Hi,
On 03/10/2015 05:52 PM, tisimst wrote:
>> The other question the OP was asking is can the group default to have
>> TWO full beams across the group
Am 10.03.2015 um 21:01 schrieb Rutger Hofman:
> So, if 32nd notes are subgrouped into groups of 4, the subgroup duration is
> 1/8 and the
> beam
On 03/10/2015 05:52 PM, tisimst wrote:
The other question the OP was asking is can the group default to have
TWO full beams across the group, while the pairs of 32nd notes are
beamed together with a third. It seems like non-standard notation, so
quick, generic solutions for any size of group, out
The other question the OP was asking is can the group default to have TWO full
beams across the group, while the pairs of 32nd notes are beamed together with
a third. It seems like non-standard notation, so quick, generic solutions for
any size of group, outside of a function like the one alread
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
% this should be all you need
% if you use \once you can aply it any time
\once \set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/20)
\tuplet 5/4 {
% no square brackets needed
e,32 c' bes e d bes' g d' d, aes'
}
% without
\tuplet 5/4
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> This is good, and helpful, but I was wanting two beams between the groups
> of 32s, not one. [Maybe this is non standard after all.]
Ah my apologies; I misread your mail. A quick search didn't yield what
property sets the default at one
This is good, and helpful, but I was wanting two beams between the groups of
32s, not one. [Maybe this is non standard after all.]
On 10 March 2015 at 23:27:30, Kevin Barry (barr...@gmail.com) wrote:
The following should be what you want. It works by setting the baseMoment to a
theoretical val
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> How can I do this in a more idiomatic, and less tedious way than the
> following?
Hi Andrew,
The following should be what you want. It works by setting the baseMoment
to a theoretical value of 1/20 (that is, four fifths of a semiquaver,
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Scharkowski"
To: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:50 PM
Subject: Beam subdivision bug in 2.15.22?
\times 2/3 { b16 b b } b8 b4 b b
2.15.22 produces a (wrong) beam subdivison.
2.14.2 output is correct.
See attachments.
Is this a bu
Thomas Scharkowski writes:
> \times 2/3 { b16 b b } b8 b4 b b
>
> 2.15.22 produces a (wrong) beam subdivison.
> 2.14.2 output is correct.
> See attachments.
>
> Is this a bug?
> I searched the bug list but did not find this one.
I would have a hard time calling this anything else. You might wan
On 17-Jan-05, at 4:39 PM, Sebastiano Vigna wrote:
sn32 sn sn
\set DrumVoice.stemRightBeamCount = #1
sn
\set DrumVoice.stemLeftBeamCount = #1
sn sn sn sn
An example of this kind would be an excellent addition to the manual.
Already exists, at least in 2.5.8.
Note that the manual uses a \property mac
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 23:56 +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> You can always use stemLeftBeamCount etc.
Now I got it: to get that kind of effect, you must use BOTH
stemLeftBeamCount AND stemRightBeamCount on the last note of the group,
as in
sn32 sn sn
\set DrumVoice.stemRightBeamCount = #1
sn
\se
On Monday 17 January 2005 22.25, Sebastiano Vigna wrote:
> Two questions (I posed one in lilypond-devel, not realising it was the
> wrong place):
>
> 1) Is there any way of forcing a beam subdivision at a certain point? I
> am typesetting drum scores, and whem I have things like
>
> sn32[ sn sn sn
28 matches
Mail list logo
