2008/9/19 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan?
As far as I could understand (since I missed the relevant discussions
too ;-) the input/new directory is meant to host snippets that are not
compatible with the LSR yet. That being said, since w
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:46:55 -0700
Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Yes, because LSR is still running 2.10. New features won't work
> > anyway.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Graham
> >
> No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan?
Yes, but having expla
Graham Percival wrote:
Yes, because LSR is still running 2.10. New features won't work
anyway.
Cheers,
- Graham
No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan?
Patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:54:09 -0700
Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Puttock wrote:
> >
> > This snippet is version specific to 2.11; it shouldn't really be in
> > LSR,
> Does that imply that there's not supposed to be any snippets to show
> how to do the new 2.11 stuff?
Yes, becau
Neil Puttock wrote:
This snippet is version specific to 2.11; it shouldn't really be in
LSR,
Does that imply that there's not supposed to be any snippets to show how
to do the new 2.11 stuff?
Patrick
but was added so it can be used in the docs. Unfortunately, some
of the properties it uses
Hi Patrick,
2008/9/18 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In snippet no. 433 the Rehearsal Marks don't have the alignment you might
> expect. Grabbing down the snippet and compiling it with the current
> lilypond works fine and produces the desired result, but in the image in the
> snippet, the
