On 5 Mar 2008, at 23:52, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Well, believe it or not, it _does_ work "as it should" when I
change the rules to
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 1 4 'Voice)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 1 2 'Voice)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 3 4
Hugo Flordal wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:20, Hugo Flordal wrote:
The problem is that you want to beam differently than
implied by the time signature you want to write. So you
want to beam in what might be described as 8 =
(1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1),
On 4 Mar 2008, at 21:55, Hugo Flordal wrote:
No. LilyPond currently only has ready-made high-level functions for
some standard situations, where time signature and beaming agree. In
other cases one will have to use low level functions, as I showed
you.
Well, believe it or not, it _does_ wor
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:20, Hugo Flordal wrote:
>
> >> The problem is that you want to beam differently than
> >> implied by the time signature you want to write. So you
> >> want to beam in what might be described as 8 =
> >> (1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1), whereas
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:20, Hugo Flordal wrote:
The problem is that you want to beam differently than
implied by the time signature you want to write. So you
want to beam in what might be described as 8 =
(1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1)+(1+1), whereas the common interpretation
of 4 is (1+1)+(1+1) or perhaps 1+1+
OK, thanks, that's one solution... but I guess that is not
the "right" way of doing it? Another way to do it is to run
these lines instead of the 4/4 specific ones I gave in the
example file.
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 'Voice)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 2 4
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
> On 3 Mar 2008, at 22:32, Hugo Flordal wrote:
> >
> > OK, thanks, that's one solution... but I guess that is
> > not the "right" way of doing it? Another way to do it is
> > to run these lines instead of the 4/4 specific ones I
> > gave in the example fil
On 3 Mar 2008, at 22:32, Hugo Flordal wrote:
OK, thanks, that's one solution... but I guess that is not
the "right" way of doing it?
The problem is that you want to beam differently than implied by the
time signature you want to write. So you want to beam in what might
be described as 8 =
On 2 Mar 2008, at 17:12, Hugo Flordal wrote:
I have problems getting autobeaming to work together with beam
subdivision in
4/4 timing. I'm typesetting for the scottish snare drum and there
are two
requirements that need to be fulfilled,
* beams should always start and end on even quart
