Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should > > use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? > > I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to > do

Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use > Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to do the same a

Re: Auto-beaming

That gives exactly the same output as the baseMoment version. On 12/15/17 04:26, Vaughan McAlley wrote: > On 15 December 2017 at 12:58, Caagr98 > wrote: > > I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including > rest+three eights or stuff contai

Re: Auto-beaming

On 15 December 2017 at 12:58, Caagr98 wrote: > I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including > rest+three eights or stuff containing sixteenths. > > On 12/15/17 02:54, Ben wrote: > > On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: > >> I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/

Re: Auto-beaming

I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including rest+three eights or stuff containing sixteenths. On 12/15/17 02:54, Ben wrote: > On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: >> I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing >> four eights to be all

Re: Auto-beaming

On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? ___ lilyp

Re: Auto-beaming

On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? ___ lilyp

Re: auto-beaming problem

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 1/18/12 8:19 AM, "Ralph Palmer" wrote: > > >Greetings - > > > >I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP. > > > >\version "2.14.1" > > Your version says 2.14. 2.14 has different syntax. > > There is a snippet in the docs for 2.14

Re: auto-beaming problem

On 1/18/12 8:19 AM, "Ralph Palmer" wrote: >Greetings - > >I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP. > >After checking the manual, especially 1.2.4 Beams : Setting automatic >beam behavior, and the LSR, I still cannot get Lilypond to beam 8th notes >in 3/4 time in 1/4 note groups. Grouping by

Re: auto-beaming problem

- Original Message - From: "James" To: "Ralph Palmer" Cc: "lilypond-user Mailinglist" Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:46 PM Subject: Re: auto-beaming problem Ralph, On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote: Greetings - I'm running Lil

Re: auto-beaming problem

Ralph, On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote: > Greetings - > > I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP. 2.12? Your example is using a \version 2.14. Is there a typo in your email? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

Rutger Hofman cs.vu.nl> writes: > > Hello list, > > the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 > time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends > to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source. > > Can you please point me how I can

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On 29 December 2011 16:23, Graham Percival wrote: > > Yes. Thank you Graham for this raisoned and well-arhued answer. Rutger, have a look at what 2 lead developers have recently said about using development version: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00503.html http://lis

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

Graham Percival writes: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> >This is fixed in the latest development version. >> >> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage? > > Yes. The current version is an improvement in a number of ways, but you are, f

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote: > >This is fixed in the latest development version. > > Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage? Yes. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On 12/29/2011 03:18 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" To: Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets? Hello list, the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 time, but if it is within a tuplet, t

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" To: Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets? Hello list, the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends to th

Re: auto-beaming

M Watts wrote Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:57 AM Mats Bengtsson wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature r

Re: auto-beaming

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams

Re: auto-beaming

In message , Trevor Daniels writes BTW, did we ever file a feature request for a function to revert all the beam-ending rules in a particular time signature? This would also be very useful. It would be ... especially when the rules are buggy :-) I think it's been fixed (so I need to upgrade)

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensen wrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:01 PM On 3/19/09 11:56 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote: BTW, did we ever file a feature request for a function to revert all the beam-ending rules in a particular time signature? This would also be very useful. I don't think we ever filed a feat

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 11:56 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote: >>> You mean, using >>> #(override-auto-beam-setting '(subdivide 1 32 3 4) 1 8) >>> to get a subdivision after the first four 32nd notes in 3/4 >>> meter? Good >>> idea! >> >> Actually, that's not what I meant. But it's what I should have >> meant

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensenwrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:42 PM On 3/19/09 8:34 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 8:34 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > Carl D. Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: >> >> >> >>> Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic >>> subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for >>> different note lengt

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for different note lengths, or would the resulting scheme get too messy to use and implement?

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > Trevor Daniels wrote: >> Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what >> I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn >> subdivideBeams on and off as required. > Should we turn this into feature request to make

Re: auto-beaming

Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, wit

Re: auto-beaming

Hi This is almost but not quite possible. You have to use beam-ending rules to obtain different beaming for different note durations (rather than beat-grouping rules, which apply to all note durations). In 2.12 the beam-ending rules are ((end * * 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 1 4)) ((end 1

Re: Auto beaming

Hi, No, Trevor's solution was the one I needed. I wanted pairs of 8ths beamed together, not everything beamed together. Thanks though! Ben On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, at 02:49AM, "Craig Bakalian" wrote: >Hi, > I don't know if you want to do this, but can't you simply use the >beaming

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

= ##f > \time 1/4 > \key g \major > \cadenzaOn > > c8 fis c a c e \bar "|" >... > >Trevor > >- Original Message - >From: "Trevor Daniels" >To: "Benedict Singer" ; >Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:22 AM >Subject: Re

Re: Auto beaming

Hi, I don't know if you want to do this, but can't you simply use the beaming syntax [ ] to handle your requirements. Like c8 [ fis c a c e \bar "|" c8 fis c a c e c d c b \bar "|" c8 d c b c g \bar "|" c8 d c b c g c fis, c' c' \bar "|" c,8 c, c' c'

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

"|" ... Trevor - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: "Benedict Singer" ; Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:22 AM Subject: Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music Hi The easiest way to do this is to set measureLength and beatLength explicitly (as you've be

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

Hi The easiest way to do this is to set measureLength and beatLength explicitly (as you've begun to do), but for them to be effective you need to either a) revert any autoBeam settings that apply to the time signature in force (here the default 4/4), as explained in Notation Reference 1.2.4

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Hi Adam, On 6/30/07, Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9 8) 6 8) You don't need this line - it doesn't do anything, since there's no default auto-beam setting for this. Also, your new values are needlessly complicated - you were almost right the firs

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Thanks Neil. I should have paid more attention to the manual when learning this...here's the fix I was looking for: %%% \time 9/8 %%% revert default values in scm/auto-beam.scm regarding 9/8 time 3+3 +3+2 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9 8) 3 8) #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Hi Adam, Your revert doesn't work because it doesn't match the default for 9/8. If you check the auto-beam engraver settings in auto-beam.scm you'll see the following line: ((end * * 9 8) . ,(ly:make-moment 3 8)) So you need to change your revert to the following: #(revert-auto-beam-setting '

Re: auto beaming strangeness

On Jun 29, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Bainos wrote: by default there is a division at 3/8.. try using revert-auto-beam.. I did try that actually...am I doing something wrong here? % \version "2.11.17-1" \relative a' { \time 9/8 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 3 8) #(override-auto-b

Re: auto beaming strangeness

by default there is a division at 3/8.. try using revert-auto-beam.. look here http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Setting-automatic-beam-behavior#Setting-automatic-beam-behavior -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/auto-beaming-strangeness-tf40008

Re: Auto beaming question

On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: Benjamin Esham wrote: - groups of sixteenth and thirty-second notes. These should also be beamed per beat, e.g. three sixteenths and two thirty-seconds. #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(e

Re: Auto beaming question

- groups of sixteenth and thirty-second notes. These should also be beamed per beat, e.g. three sixteenths and two thirty-seconds. #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 2 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 3

Re: auto-beaming question

Joe Neeman wrote: The reason is because of these 2 lines in /usr/share/lilypond/2.6.X/scm/auto-beam.scm (or whereever you have installed lilypond): ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 1 8)) ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 3 8)) That is, lilypond has a built-in beam setting that breaks a

Re: auto-beaming question

\version "2.6.3" \score { \new Staff { \relative c'{ \key g \major \clef violin \time 2/4 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) c16. c32 c8 c4 %Bar 1 c8 c16. c32 c4 %Bar 2 }}} The result can be seen here: http://pocentek.perso.cegetel.net/test-overri

Re: auto-beaming question

Graham Percival wrote: If you haven't already, try reading section 8.6.2 from the documentation for 2.7. The docs have been (hopefully) clarified, and it will all apply to 2.6 as well. Done. The documentation seems clear to me, but there's something I don't understand. Here is a short exam

Re: auto-beaming question

On 22-Aug-05, at 12:31 PM, Gauvain Pocentek wrote: es16.[ es32 d16. c32] and I'd like beaming to be automatically set as in the above exemple, without using []. I've tried many things like: #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) If you haven't already, try reading section

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 15 Aug 2005, at 01:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

Hans Aberg wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert automated dotted bar-lines

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 9 Aug 2005, at 13:42, Mats Bengtsson wrote: The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } which you can add in one of your staves (since a \bar statement appl

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

Mats Bengtsson wrote: The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } This should of course be barlines = { \repeat unfold 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 |

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } which you can add in one of your staves (since a \bar statement applies to all staves, you can add it anywhere): \sco

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 9 Aug 2005, at 00:50, Graham Percival wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7-Aug-05, at 10:04 AM, Hans Aberg wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert aut

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7 Aug 2005, at 14:28, Hans Aberg wrote: The rule seems to only work when decomposing the time signature in two parts. For example 7 = 4 + 3 works fine using \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) But what do I write if I want to use 7 = 2 + 2 + 3 (or 13 = 4 + 4

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7 Aug 2005, at 04:28, Graham Percival wrote: How do I auto-beam in asymmetrical times signatures? For example, 7/16 may decompose as (2+2+3)/16, (4+3)/16, (3+2+2)/16. You look at doc section 6.4.4 Automatic beams You follow the link to 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior You read that

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 5-Aug-05, at 7:31 AM, Hans Aberg wrote: How do I auto-beam in asymmetrical times signatures? For example, 7/16 may decompose as (2+2+3)/16, (4+3)/16, (3+2+2)/16. You look at doc section 6.4.4 Automatic beams You follow the link to 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior You read that page.