Re: Acciactura legato slurs

2004-11-04 Thread dax2
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:20:34 +0200 Mats wrote: > My guess is that the hack was introduced to compensate for some > version of LilyPond, where the acciaccatura slur was curved > upwards by defaul, and was placed at the note heads or even > below the beams. The best (?!) way to find out why is proba

Re: Acciactura legato slurs

2004-10-27 Thread Mats Bengtsson
My guess is that the hack was introduced to compensate for some version of LilyPond, where the acciaccatura slur was curved upwards by defaul, and was placed at the note heads or even below the beams. The best (?!) way to find out why is probably to try the original code without the extra fix using

Re: Acciactura legato slurs

2004-10-27 Thread dax2
Thank you very much for the answer, it works, yes: On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:26:38 +0200 Erik wrote: > > %%dax: The slur here turns downside up in 2.3.23. > > > >\acciaccatura { > Remove the following line, and it works fine: > > \once\override Slur #'extra-offset = #'( 0

Re: Acciactura legato slurs

2004-10-25 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 25 October 2004 11.05, dax2 wrote: >Here is a short version of a message awaiting moderator > approval because it was too long. > >Lilypond 2.3.23 built from CVS without problems, docs too. > However: > >1) the slurs turns 180 degrees in the special > "acciaccatura" sect