Jan
Thanks for the detailed reply. I'm really pleased that both the
Cygwin and the native Windows version will be there, and I can see the
advantages of the native version for many people.
> Also, GNU/Linux is far superior to Windows+Cygwin.
Definitely. I use the GNU/Linux version whenever I c
Colin Wilding writes:
> I've tried the Windows version, and I am sure some people will like
> it, but it's not for me:
That's fine. Native Windows version is not primarily targetted at
Cygwin users.
> 1. There seems so be no feedback at the command line. If I am updating an
> existing file the
Bert, that's great news. Even if most of my problems have workarounds,
as Mat suggests, I'd rather continue to use Cygwin if possible.
Will it be possible to install 2.6 and also keep 2.4.3? I can't
use 2.6 'live' at the moment because there seem to be things that do
not work at the moment - or a
I'm working on the cygwin version, actually it is building now, but
there may be problems, so I'm not sure I can upload it today. However,
when I success building lily without the documentation (because usually
building the doc has the most problems), I'll create an unofficial release.
Bert
If you search the mailing list archives (don't forget those for
lilypond-devel and user-lilypond) over the last 2-3 weeks, you will
notice that most of these issues have already been discussed and
"solved".
/Mats
Colin Wilding wrote:
Please could someone reassure me that Lilypond 2.6 will sti
> Please could someone reassure me that Lilypond 2.6 will still be
> available on Cygwin, even though there is now a native Windows
> version?
> 5. I generally run Lilypond from jEdit and I'm
> not sure if I can get jEdit to run the native version.
It works with with lilypond tool 0.2.8.
Thomas
