Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {.
Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
}
How would one make
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
}
How would one make small_staff.lyi so this worked? This way it would
be
(sorry for the duplicate message, the first one bounced)
My 2 cents...
1) The 1891 Breitkopf & Härtel edition of Brahms' Piano Trio
Op.8 (1889 version) has the smaller staves exactly 2/3
the height of the larger staves. Click "Complete score":
http://imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Trio_No.1,_Op
Kieren MacMillan Sunday, August 09, 2009 4:47 AM
From my point of view the main use for smallStaff (or whatever it
gets called) is for ossia staves.
Except IIRC ossia staves and solo/cue staves are usually of
different sizes, yes?
In scores for a capella vocal music a piano
accompaniment
Hi Nick,
From my point of view the main use for smallStaff (or whatever it
gets called) is for ossia staves.
Except IIRC ossia staves and solo/cue staves are usually of different
sizes, yes?
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
; Behalf Of Jay Anderson
> Sent: Sunday, 9 August 2009 10:18 AM
> To: Alexander Kobel; Dan Eble
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Jonathan Wilkes; lilypond-devel
> Subject: Re: \context for named Staff
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Eble wrote:
> > Doesn't this mix up me
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:18:12PM -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
> If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
>
> \include "small_staff.lyi"
BTW, the latest discussion was to use .ily
> How would one make small_staff.lyi so this worked? This way it would
> be bundled with the other g
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Eble wrote:
> Doesn't this mix up meaning and appearance? What will you do when people
> come asking for LargeStaff, TinyStaff, LittleGreenStaff (for Martian music),
> and so forth?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Oh, and by the way...
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Just a small point: has anyone confirmed that -3 is a "standard" magstep?
Just my thought. I used some values between -2 and -3, depending on what
fits for this very score and page size.
In "The Essential Dictionary of Music Notation" (Gerou and Lusk) - well,
admitte
Hi Jay (et al.):
Attached is a patch which adds "SmallStaff" to engraver-init.ly.
Everywhere that \accepts "Staff" was used I just added \accepts
"SmallStaff". Let me know if this looks good.
Just a small point: has anyone confirmed that -3 is a "standard"
magstep?
1. When looking at hand-en
> Jay, Mark, anyone: are you interested in submitting a full patch, with
> appropriate documentation, NEWS item etc? If so, we can officially
> submit it for inclusion.
Attached is a patch which adds "SmallStaff" to engraver-init.ly.
Everywhere that \accepts "Staff" was used I just added \accepts
2009/8/8 Mark Polesky :
>
> Jay Anderson wrote:
>
>> \context
>> {
>> \Staff
>> \type "Engraver_group"
>> \name "SmallStaff"
>> \alias "Staff"
>>
>> fontSize = #-3
>> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3)
>> }
>
> I like it.
Jay, Mark,
Jay Anderson wrote:
> \context
> {
> \Staff
> \type "Engraver_group"
> \name "SmallStaff"
> \alias "Staff"
>
> fontSize = #-3
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3)
> }
I like it.
- Mark
_
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
>> How about creating a FluteStaff context, and invoke it with
>> \new FluteStaff
>> instead of \with?
>
> I think "SmallStaff" is more accurate.
> - Mark
It would be nice if something like this were included in th
Valentin Villenave wrote:
> How about creating a FluteStaff context, and invoke it with
> \new FluteStaff
> instead of \with?
I think "SmallStaff" is more accurate.
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
2009/8/7 Mark Polesky :
> At the moment, this is the best I can come up with.
> smallStaff = {
> #(define factor 3/4)
> \set Staff.fontSize = #(inverse-magstep factor)
> \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #factor
> }
How about creating a FluteStaff context, and invoke it with
\new Flu
Thanks, Mark, I'll try this out and let you know how it works.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Mark Polesky wrote:
> From: Mark Polesky
> Subject: Re: \context for named Staff
> To: "Mark Polesky" , "Jonathan Wilkes"
> , lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
Mark Polesky wrote:
> #(define (inverse-magstep x)
> (* 6 (/ (log x) (log 2
Just noticed the scheme procedure "magnification->font-size" already
defined in font.scm... Use that and get rid of my "inverse-magstep".
- Mark
___
lilypond
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> But I guess it's not possible to refer to a specific instance of
> a Staff in the layout block (at least I couldn't find any
> reference to doing this).
Not that I know of, but I've always silently wished for this.
I'll ask the developers.
> If this is true, then how do
ed utilizing it so
maybe I'm wrong.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, James E. Bailey wrote:
> From: James E. Bailey
> Subject: Re: \context for named Staff
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 9:40 PM
> If it's j
If it's just for the piano score, I would just make that change in
the piano score \new Staff \with { resize }. Is there more than one
score that needs this adjustment?
On 07.08.2009, at 21:18, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Hello again,
I'm trying to resize one staff in a flute/piano duet,
22 matches
Mail list logo
