Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread David Kastrup
Neil Thornock writes: >>> Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or >>> simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff >>> >>> I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to >>> avoid what is obviously something that does confuse people.

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread Colin Hall
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:23:08PM -, Phil Holmes wrote: > > "David Bobroff" wrote in message > news:4f547dc7.10...@centrum.is... > >I'm re-framing my query regarding accidental behavior following > >\cadenzaOff. After some discussion about this on bug- it is quite > >clear that '\cadenzaOf

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread Neil Thornock
>> >> Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or >> simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff >> >> I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to >> avoid what is obviously something that does confuse people. > > I still have not figur

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > Hello, > > On 5 March 2012 15:20, David Kastrup wrote: >> Neil Thornock writes: >> >>> In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the >>> cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later.  I'm not sure >>> why it behaves as it does. >> >> It resets t

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread James
Hello, On 5 March 2012 15:20, David Kastrup wrote: > Neil Thornock writes: > >> In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the >> cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later.  I'm not sure >> why it behaves as it does. > > It resets timing to normal, and "normal

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread David Kastrup
Neil Thornock writes: > In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the > cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure > why it behaves as it does. It resets timing to normal, and "normal" does not mean the end of a measure. -- David Kastrup ___

Re: \cadenzaOff and accidentals

2012-03-05 Thread Neil Thornock
In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure why it behaves as it does. In any case, I always turn the cadenza off a full measure before I actually want it turned off. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Da