Am 17.08.23 um 13:05 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
Le jeudi 17 août 2023 à 12:28 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
(The even friendlier syntax variant would require changing the
lexer/parser, I think.)
Why don't you just do
<"/">
?
Two reasons:
- I wasn't aware that figures support " "
The slash is pronounced the best of several possibilites by
C. Ph. E. Bach [...]
Thanks. Please open an issue for SMuFL at
https://github.com/w3c/smufl/issues
so that this slash symbol gets added to the figured bass glyphs.
https://github.com/w3c/smufl/issues/279
>> In particular, there is no fitting glyph in the SMuFL specification
>> (AFAICS). Consequently, a simple `\markup` solution is probably
>> the way to go.
>
> The slash is pronounced the best of several possibilites by
> C. Ph. E. Bach [...]
Thanks. Please open an issue for SMuFL at
https
Le jeudi 17 août 2023 à 12:28 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
> (The even friendlier syntax variant would require changing the
> lexer/parser, I think.)
Why don't you just do
<"/">
?
Obviously, you can customize it with
\version "2.25.7"
slashMarkup =
\markup
\beam #0.5 #2.0 #0.3
> From Förster's book:
> https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10527178?page=64 ex. 141
> I also attach an example from his "Practische Beyspiele", in which a
> slightly different layout is being used in which the slash and the
> figure are put separately over their respective notes.
>
> Of
