Il 19/01/2013 12:29, Trevor Daniels ha scritto:
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:10 AM
Nick Payne writes:
BTW, both #(ly:make-moment 1 4) and #(ly:make-moment 1/4) are valid,
Is one form preferred over the other? If so, maybe that should be
consistently used throughout the
Mr. Kastrup:
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David
Kastrup
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:39 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
>> On 19/01/13 18:04, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>>
>> Hello:
>>
>> From the manual:
>>
>> \relative c' {
>>
>> \time 2/4
>>
>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>>
>> \times 2/3 { c8 c c c c c }
>>
>>
@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Nick Payne
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:23 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: tupletSpannerDuration
On 19/01/13 18:04, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello:
>From the manual:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(l
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:10 AM
> Nick Payne writes:
>
>> BTW, both #(ly:make-moment 1 4) and #(ly:make-moment 1/4) are valid,
>>
>> Is one form preferred over the other? If so, maybe that should be
>> consistently used throughout the documentation.
>
> At any rate, due
Nick Payne writes:
> On 19/01/13 18:04, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> From the manual:
>
> \relative c' {
>
> \time 2/4
>
> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>
> \times 2/3 { c8 c c c c c }
>
> }
>
> I un
On 19/01/13 18:04, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello:
From the manual:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 { c8 c c c c c }
}
I understand everything except how the "1" and "4" relate to the notation.
Have a look at the section of
