Am Mittwoch, den 10.04.2013, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>
> I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer
> program doesn't know that word :-)
> >>>
> >>> Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at
On 10 Apr 2013, at 11:38 , Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Just like my lilypond scores I often still write (simple) html code
using just Vim. Maybe I'm just getting old and old fashioned :-)
+1, we're not alone..
Regards,
Wim.
___
lilypond-user m
>%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer
program doesn't know that word :-)
>>>
>>> Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at
>>> every line.
Really? It's like having a BASIC program which always sta
%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
instead.
I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
doesn't know that word :-)
Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line.
In general I think tools like musicxml2ly and other programs that convert
bject: Re: musicxml2ly enhancements
Am 09.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> 2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG :
>>> Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
>>>
>>>%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>>>
>>> instead.
>> I like t
Am 09.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG :
Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
instead.
I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
doesn't know that word :-)
Indeed, but i find it
2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG :
>> Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
>>
>> %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>>
>> instead.
>
> I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
> doesn't know that word :-)
Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it w
OK. Please consider my suggestion as obsolete, but I'd like to clarify
what I intended to say (but obviously failed to do so)
Quoting David Kastrup :
Urs Liska writes:
Would something like
%@5 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
be an option?
The combination'%@' would indicate that the next token is
2013/4/9 David Kastrup :
> In the same sense that drilling a hole in your knee and pouring in milk
> is an option, definitely.
ROFLMAO
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 09.04.2013 11:38, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>> Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
>>>
>>>%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>>>
>>> instead.
>> I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
>> doesn't know that word :-)
>>
>>
Am 09.04.2013 11:38, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
instead.
I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
doesn't know that word :-)
Werner
Would something like
%@5 a,4 ( a4
> Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require
>
> %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>
> instead.
I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program
doesn't know that word :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Jacques Menu TvTMail writes:
> The math I mentioned is because I interpreted the bar number in:
>
> a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | % 6
>
> as a help to locate the offending bar number…
Well, it is a help but probably not immediately what you'd like best. I
think it is reasonable to have bar checks at t
The math I mentioned is because I interpreted the bar number in:
a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | % 6
as a help to locate the offending bar number…
David, sorry I offended you about work going on. I've got only one experience
in open software contributions so far, which lead to a dead-end: these
On 09.04.2013, at 09:01, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 09.04.2013 08:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jacques Menu writes:
>>
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily,
>>> i.e. as a note input engine.
>>>
>>> This lead me to fix some issues in musicxml2
Am 09.04.2013 08:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jacques Menu writes:
Hello folks,
I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily,
i.e. as a note input engine.
This lead me to fix some issues in musicxml2ly:
- the comment bar number at the end of regular lines is one
t
Jacques Menu writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily,
> i.e. as a note input engine.
>
> This lead me to fix some issues in musicxml2ly:
> - the comment bar number at the end of regular lines is one
> too much;
I don't see that. It is
17 matches
Mail list logo
