Graham Percival wrote 07 November 2007 16:29
>
> Ok, I was convinced that some reorg was better.
>
> Educational -> Editorial annotations
> Note heads -> 1.1 Pitches
> 1.3.3 Analysis brackets -> Editorial
>
> Take a look at it and let me know what you think.
> Docs in the usual GDP
> place.
>
Ok, I was convinced that some reorg was better.
Educational -> Editorial annotations
Note heads -> 1.1 Pitches
1.3.3 Analysis brackets -> Editorial
Take a look at it and let me know what you think. Docs in the usual GDP
place.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
Graham Percival wrote 06 November 2007 08:54
>
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> >
> > To me "editorial notation" gives the impression
> that it's something
> > different
> > from normal music typesetting notation,
>
> You have a point here.
>
> Basically, we just want to say "stuff that makes
> mu
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
To me "editorial notation" gives the impression that it's something
different
from normal music typesetting notation,
You have a point here.
Basically, we just want to say "stuff that makes music easier to read".
I can't think of any short, formal-language phrase t
Graham Percival wrote:
Ooo, I really like "Editorial notation". Anybody object?
Is it "Editorial notation" or rather "Editorial annotations" (or maybe
these two
alternatives have so similar meaning that it doesn't matter)?
To me "editorial notation" gives the impression that it's something
Brett Duncan wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
"editorial" rather than simply "educational". So what about "Ed
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
"editorial" rather than simply "educational". So what about "Editorial
Notation" or
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
No, not at all.
Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name change.
Quite a lot in this section is not really
educational notation or use. Coul
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
Graham Percival wrote on 03 November 2007 06:55
>
> I've decided to do the rest of the first drafts right now.
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
>
> Here's the TODO list.
>
>
> Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
Quite a lot in this sectio
