Re: double time signatures

2010-12-12 Thread Martin Kemp
Brilliant! thanks for the fix. I'll post it to LSR later today. Best Martin On 12/11/2010 10:06 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Am Samstag, 11. Dezember 2010, um 20:33:43 schrieb Martin Kemp: I have nearly got what I want with the following snippet but can't currently centrally align 12 over

RE: double time signatures

2010-12-12 Thread James Lowe
Hello, -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Reinhold Kainhofer Sent: Sat 12/11/2010 22:08 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: James Bailey Subject: Re: double time signatures Am Samstag, 11. Dezember 2010, um 21:18:40 schrieb James

Re: double time signatures

2010-12-11 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Samstag, 11. Dezember 2010, um 21:18:40 schrieb James Bailey: > On Dec 11, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Martin Kemp wrote: > > Dear All > > > > I have nearly got what I want with the following snippet but can't > > currently centrally align 12 over 8 (12/8). Any help gratefully > > apprecitated. > > You

Re: double time signatures

2010-12-11 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Samstag, 11. Dezember 2010, um 20:33:43 schrieb Martin Kemp: > I have nearly got what I want with the following snippet but can't > currently centrally align 12 over 8 (12/8). [...] > (#:fontsize 0 #:column (a b))) \column always left-aligns its contents. What you want is center-column

RE: double time signatures

2010-12-11 Thread James Lowe
Hello -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Martin Kemp Sent: Sat 12/11/2010 19:33 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: double time signatures Dear All I have nearly got what I want with the following snippet but can't currently cen

Re: double time signatures

2010-12-11 Thread James Bailey
On Dec 11, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Martin Kemp wrote: > Dear All > > I have nearly got what I want with the following snippet but can't currently > centrally align 12 over 8 (12/8). Any help gratefully apprecitated. You may be re-inventing the whell. Perhaps http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilyp

Re: Double time signatures

2006-08-07 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Actually, if you had specified the time signature only in the second stave, you would have seen the same bug. Another variation of the same bug is: \version "2.9.11" \score { << \new Staff \relative c' { \time 8/8 c1 \acciaccatura c16 c4 d4 r4 r4 } \new Staff \rel

Re: Double time signatures

2006-08-07 Thread Henrik Frisk
OK, I had a feeling I had seen something about it. What throws me off here is that it's the redundant \time command in the second staff that makes the difference. Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please read the section on grace notes in the manual. > >/Mats > > Henrik Frisk wrot

Re: Double time signatures

2006-08-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Please read the section on grace notes in the manual. /Mats Henrik Frisk wrote: Hi, Just noticed an odd thing with time signatures. The following prints double time signatures at the beginning of a bar: \version "2.9.11" \score { << \new Staff \relative c' { \time 8/8 \acciac