Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 schrieben Sie:
See section "Multi measure rests" in the manual.
Thanks, but that's the first place that I looked. It only says that the
fermata markup is a MultiMeasureRestText. The internal reference then says
that these objects
2008/1/13, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW, I realized that I forgot some events in the filter function (namely
> CrescendoEvent, DecrescendoEvent, etc.), but I suppose users will have to
> find out themselves, as I can't modify it any more after you approved it.
If you want to corr
Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> See section "Multi measure rests" in the manual.
Thanks, but that's the first place that I looked. It only says that the
fermata markup is a MultiMeasureRestText. The internal reference then says
that these objects are created by Multi_measure_rest_eng
See section "Multi measure rests" in the manual.
/Mats
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are printed on
the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc. once, I
simply remove the corresponding engravers from the seco
2008/1/13, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wow, that's really cool!
It is indeed :)
> Thanks a lot for the scheme code. I've added a
> snippet to the LSR showcasing your approach:
>
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=372
Thanks, (happily) approved. I modified your title a bit, howe
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2008 schrieb Gilles THIBAULT:
> > I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are
> > printed on
> > the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc.
> > once, I
> > simply remove the corresponding engravers from the second voice. Howeve
I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are printed
on
the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc. once,
I
simply remove the corresponding engravers from the second voice. However,
I
have not been able to find the proper engraver for the \fermataM
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote 12 January 2008 21:54
>
> Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> > Why not just leave the fermata (and everything
> else that you
> > don't want) out of mII?
>
> Because I'm also creating one score for the
> second voice alone, so each voice
> needs t
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> A possible solution would be to temporarily redefine the
> \fermataMarkup shortcut.
>
> As you can see in property-init.ly, it is defined as follows:
>
> fermataMarkup = \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata" }
>
> Why not temporarily define it as :
>
2008/1/12, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are printed on
> the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc. once, I
> simply remove the corresponding engravers from the second voice. However, I
> have not
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Why not just leave the fermata (and everything else that you
> don't want) out of mII?
Because I'm also creating one score for the second voice alone, so each voice
needs to have the full dynamics/articulations/ornaments... (And as these are
Why not just leave the fermata (and everything else that you
don't want) out of mII? Or am I missing something?
Trevor D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Reinhold Kainhofer
> Sent: 12 Janu
12 matches
Mail list logo
