-user@gnu.org; David Nalesnik
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
2012/12/6 Mark Stephen Mrotek :
> Hello:
>
> The e-mails with suggestions often contain snippets. Some of them I
> understand (with the help of Frescobaldi), some are a bit beyond my
> current practice, and all o
2012/12/6 Mark Stephen Mrotek :
> Hello:
>
> The e-mails with suggestions often contain snippets. Some of them I
> understand (with the help of Frescobaldi), some are a bit beyond my current
> practice, and all of them could be helpful in the future.
>
> If a "library" of snippets exists, where is
er@gnu.org; David Nalesnik
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen :
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
added to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there
already.
>
> DR
I added a s
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen :
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
> added to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there
> already.
>
> DR
I added a snippet to the LSR. Preview at
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=860
Cheers,
Ha
Am 12.11.2012 06:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Daniel Rosen writes:
>
>> Well, that's what I meant when I said that I can't speak to whether
>> the code was good--I don't know what kind of stuff to check for. But I
>> do personally think the functionality is useful.
>
> Do you have any hand-eng
Morley; David Nalesnik; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Well, that's what I meant when I said that I can't speak to whether
> the code was good--I don't know what kind of stuff to check for. But I
> do personally think the
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Well, that's what I meant when I said that I can't speak to whether
> the code was good--I don't know what kind of stuff to check for. But I
> do personally think the functionality is useful.
Do you have any hand-engraved scores using this arrangement of typlet
numbers?
-
]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 5:57 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: David Nalesnik; David Kastrup; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen :
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
> added to the LSR. Quite frankl
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen :
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
> added to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there
> already.
>
> DR
Do you really think it's usefull?
As soon as polyphonic occurs, it will produce weird output (I th
2012 5:32 PM
To: David Nalesnik
Cc: Daniel Rosen; David Kastrup; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
2012/11/11 David Nalesnik :
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>> Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
&g
2012/11/11 David Nalesnik :
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>> Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
>> certainly appears to be), but I know absolutely nothing about Scheme. I'll
>> have to read the Extending manual one of these days.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
> certainly appears to be), but I know absolutely nothing about Scheme. I'll
> have to read the Extending manual one of these days.
>
Yes--Scheme certainly opens u
l.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:53 PM
To: Daniel Rosen; David Kastrup
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> I guess I should have been more clear, but I was in a rush. What I'm actually
> looking for
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> I guess I should have been more clear, but I was in a rush. What I'm actually
> looking for is a function to have tuplet numbers ALWAYS appear on the note
> head side, regardless of stem direction.
You could do something like this, which lo
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Also, I'm a little confused as to why \override TupletNumber
> #'direction = #-1 isn't working just as well in the meantime.
Because it is not consulted?
\version "2.16.0"
\new Voice {
\times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
\override TupletBracket #'direction = #DOWN
\times 2/3 {
Also, I'm a little confused as to why \override TupletNumber #'direction = #-1
isn't working just as well in the meantime.
DR
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:52 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: R
er 11, 2012 11:52 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
Daniel Rosen writes:
> \version "2.16.0" \times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
>
> Is there a way to get the TupletNumber to show up on the note head
> side instead of the beam side? Seems t
Daniel Rosen writes:
> \version "2.16.0" \times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
>
> Is there a way to get the TupletNumber to show up on the note head
> side instead of the beam side? Seems to me that this would be a pretty
> common tweak, and I can't find it in the manuals or the LSR or
> anywhere in the list
18 matches
Mail list logo
