Re: Tremolo positioning

2006-05-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006/5/24, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It appears it didn't, thanks. Can I apply this to 2.8, Han-Wen? please do. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://li

RE: Tremolo positioning

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Neeman
> > Sent: 24 May 2006 12:30 > > To: Ralph Little > > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > > Subject: Re: Tremolo positioning > > > > On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:06 +0100, Ralph Little wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I saw some comments earlier on tremolo positioning. &

RE: Tremolo positioning

2006-05-24 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, Cheers. I just downloaded 2.8.3 and it's still wrong unfortunately. Do you know if it got into 2.8.3? Regards Ralph > -Original Message- > From: Joe Neeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 May 2006 12:30 > To: Ralph Little > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org &g

Re: Tremolo positioning

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:06 +0100, Ralph Little wrote: > Hi, > I saw some comments earlier on tremolo positioning. > > I've seen some issues with some tremolos on semiquavers in 2.8.1 (on > windows) This issue came up on the bug list recently and it should be fixed in the latest stable version.