- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bostjan Kuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-book and different versions of Lilypond
>
>
> B
Bostjan Kuzman wrote:
Thanks, this will come handy. However, this conversion doesn't replace
"11pt" option with "staffwidth=11".
If I keep "11pt" in the code, I get several warnings from lilypond-book
and on running latex I get this:
LaTeX error: missing \begin{document}
l.1 ^^ef
^^bf^^\docu
Bostjan Kuzman wrote:
After some tweaking I've found that in 2.1.28:
- to add line breaks between fragments, I just add 2 empty lines in
input file,
Like in any normal LaTeX document. What you saw before was a
bug in the old lilypond-book.
/Mats
___
ge-
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:08 PM
To: Bertalan Fodor
Cc: 'Bostjan Kuzman'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lilypond-book and different versions of Lilypond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Have you seen lilypond --help?
>
> I
After some tweaking I've found that in 2.1.28:
- to add line breaks between fragments, I just add 2 empty lines in
input file,
- to avoid some latex-processing errors, all I had to do was to replace
the old "11pt" option in \begin[11pt]{lilypond} with "staffwidth=11".
This is quite weird, because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Have you seen lilypond --help?
>
> It says you can use this:
>
>lilypond-book --filter="convert-ly --no-version --from=2.0.0 -" BOOK
>
> Do you not need this?
That actually doesn't work due to some refactoring of the code. You
can simply use
convert-ly -n --
Have you seen lilypond --help?
It says you can use this:
lilypond-book --filter="convert-ly --no-version --from=2.0.0 -" BOOK
Do you not need this?
Bert
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
