>> order in which the fingering indications appear above the stave doesn't
>> match the pitch order of the notes they are applied to.
Just to be clear, that wasn't happening for me... the order was fine,
it was just that the fingering indications in one voice were colliding
with note heads/stems o
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:10 PM
I find the same thing happens with guitar fingering - that
sometimes the
order in which the fingering indications appear above the stave
doesn't
match the pitch order of the notes they are applied to.
Do you have an example which shows this ha
-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerard Neil
> Sent: Sunday, 12 April 2009 12:20
> To: -Eluze
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Fingering multiple voi
2009/4/12 Carl D. Sorensen :
> I thought this would be easy, but it took me a while longer than I expected.
> This file includes two slightly different ways of doing it:
Carl, you're a champion! Thanks! That's exactly what I was trying to
do. I'd sort of worked out that those were the two approac
> hi
> which version are you using? when i compile your code wit version 2.12.2 i
> do not get collisions.
I'm using 2.12.1 ; the most obvious problem was the 2 on the final c
sharp being printed underneath the a of the topmost voice, is that
fixed in 2.12.2. That would be nice!
> if you feel ste
On 4/11/09 9:27 AM, "Gerard Neil" wrote:
>
> So I've got two questions:
> 1. Can someone help me write a macro/function to make this simpler? It
> would be nice to be able to write something like a^\multiFinger { 2 3
> }, for example. I'm sure this is possible, but I've spent a few hours
>
hi
which version are you using? when i compile your code wit version 2.12.2 i
do not get collisions.
if you feel stems and fingerings are to close you could add some extraspace
with
\override Fingering #'extra-offset = #'( -0.5 . 0)
or choose the value you prefer
hth
--
View this message in
