Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-28 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes If you own the copyright on a piece of intellectual property, you have the ability to grant a license to use it, in much the same way you can grant licenses to use any type of property that you own. This is from an American poi

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread Darius Blasband
Did I miss anything ? It might be true that I ought to be more explicit about what people are allowed to do with these scores, but I don't think I'm giving away anything serious here. The music is copyrighted, one cannot just play it nor record it without my consent, The score is freely

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread dax2
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:27:38 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In other word, by making the music available, I just remove the hurdle > of having to retranscribe it by ear. I just make my music easier to find, Thank you for doing that. I liked very much the style, the drive, the feeling and of the

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread darius
Well, since I started this argument by putting my scores online, please let me explain my own little rationale... - I'm no Mozart, I'm no Beatle. I don't think that the music I write will ever be valuable enough for the score edition business to make any sense for me. - The only intere

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 17 December 2004 21.32, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 02:14 pm, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > On Friday 17 December 2004 17.49, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > > On Friday 17 December 2004 05:46 am, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > > > > > No. So what if it did? What prote

RE: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread James Moore
> > The copyright *is* the license, which belongs exclusively > > to the copyright holder. That's the whole idea of a copyright. Don't > > attempt to share it with all and sundry, only with BMI/ASCAP or the like > if > > you want. A user license would amount to assigning it. > > Sorry, I didn't

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 17 December 2004 17.49, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 05:46 am, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > On Friday 17 December 2004 01.24, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > > > > > A license *might* protect some evildoer ripping you off but it won't > > > protect you, You don't

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-17 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 17 December 2004 01.24, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > On Thursday 16 December 2004 05:16 pm, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > On Thursday 16 December 2004 22.10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > (This does not mean that the music is not copyrighted, or that it is > > > not subject to execution righ

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-16 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Thursday 16 December 2004 05:16 pm, Erik Sandberg wrote: > On Thursday 16 December 2004 22.10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I used Lilypond to write "The Legend of the Toad", which will be > > commercially available mid January in a recording by Roby Lakatos, > > and for which a demo which can b

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-16 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Great music with great musicians. I especially liked hearing the cimbalom in such musical context. The music is beatiful. It is pleasure for me to be together on this list with musicians of this talent. To include the score is a great idea also, it is very good to hear what a difference there i

Re: Another Lilypond Story

2004-12-16 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Thursday 16 December 2004 22.10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I used Lilypond to write "The Legend of the Toad", which will be > commercially available mid January in a recording by Roby Lakatos, > and for which a demo which can be downloaded from > > http://www.thelegendofthetoad.com > > as well