Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread Jacques Menu Muzhic
Brilliant! JM > Le 26 nov. 2016 à 17:52, David Kastrup a écrit : > > David Sumbler writes: > >> Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using >> >> \once \omit Accidental >> >> as suggested by Noeck. >> >> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think

Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > David Sumbler writes: > >> Thanks for these 2 replies.  I have tidied things up a bit by using >> >> \once \omit Accidental >> >> as suggested by Noeck. >> >> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about >> (which is good!).  The quoted "@", \singl

Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread David Kastrup
David Sumbler writes: > Thanks for these 2 replies.  I have tidied things up a bit by using > > \once \omit Accidental > > as suggested by Noeck. > > David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about > (which is good!).  The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all > effectively n

Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread David Sumbler
Thanks for these 2 replies.  I have tidied things up a bit by using \once \omit Accidental as suggested by Noeck. David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about (which is good!).  The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all effectively new to me - although I must have read ab

Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread David Kastrup
Noeck writes: > Hi David, > > yes, I think there is no such command as short as ?. > >> Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous - >> but I just wondered if there was an even easier way. > > \once \omit Accidental > is the same and it is a bit shorter but no way near ! o

Re: Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread Noeck
Hi David, yes, I think there is no such command as short as ?. > Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous - > but I just wondered if there was an even easier way. \once \omit Accidental is the same and it is a bit shorter but no way near ! or ?. Of course, you can alway

Quick question about accidentals

2016-11-26 Thread David Sumbler
In Lilypond we have '!' to force an accidental to appear and '?' to produce a cautionary accidental. Is there any similarly simple way to prevent an accidental being printed where it otherwise would be? Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous - but I just wondered if th