2017-05-30 12:13 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Kleine :
> I read the thread, you mentioned: ges4.:9^7 does not display differently
> from ges4.:9. The cord is different but not the symbol. As I am not
> working with cords only with cordnames, I would like to have a different
> cordname. Is that possible?
>
I read the thread, you mentioned: ges4.:9^7 does not display differently
from ges4.:9. The cord is different but not the symbol. As I am not
working with cords only with cordnames, I would like to have a different
cordname. Is that possible?
Thanks Bernhard
Am 30.05.2017 um 11:24 schrieb Thomas
2017-05-30 9:58 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Kleine :
> In my manuscripte there is a ges add9. Unfortunately, add9 throws an error
> while compiling. What is the equivalent to add9: ges:9 or ges:m9 seems not
> correct since the accord does not decide with a Dominant or minor seventh
> should be added. It is
In my manuscripte there is a ges add9. Unfortunately, add9 throws an
error while compiling. What is the equivalent to add9: ges:9 or ges:m9
seems not correct since the accord does not decide with a Dominant or
minor seventh should be added. It is a "mere" ninth?
Thanks for your help
Bernhard
--
