Fixed!
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 9:34 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Paolo Prete writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Paolo Prete writes:
> >>
> >>
> >> Still scheme? instead of markup?
> >>
> >> Still a scheme function instead of a markup command.
> >>
> >> >
Paolo Prete writes:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Paolo Prete writes:
>>
>>
>> Still scheme? instead of markup?
>>
>> Still a scheme function instead of a markup command.
>>
>> > #{
>> > \markup \
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Paolo Prete writes:
>
>
> Still scheme? instead of markup?
>
> Still a scheme function instead of a markup command.
>
> > #{
> > \markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0)
> #'(0
>
Paolo Prete writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:56 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Paolo Prete writes:
>>>
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Given:
>>> >
>>> > floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
>>> > (number? number? scheme?)
>>> > #{
>
I see but the problem remains. I would like to found a way to pass a more
structured object to that function, not only a string:
%%
\version "2.24.1"
floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
(number? number? scheme?)
#{
Paolo Prete writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given:
>
> floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
> (number? number? scheme?)
> #{
> \markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0
> . 0){
>
Hello,
Given:
floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
(number? number? scheme?)
#{
\markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0
. 0){
\override #'(baseline-skip . 0)
