Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-11-28 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/15 Janek Warchoł : > 2013/9/14 Jim Long : >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:14:55PM +0200, Janek Warcho?? wrote: >>> >>> I think that we should add to LilyPond a simple, user-friendly >>> interface that would allow choosing the "density" of music, so that >>> one could write >>> \layout { \horiz

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-15 Thread PMA
PMA wrote: David Kastrup wrote: PMA writes: David Kastrup wrote: PMA writes: Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a fact

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-15 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/14 Jim Long : > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:14:55PM +0200, Janek Warcho?? wrote: >> >> I think that we should add to LilyPond a simple, user-friendly >> interface that would allow choosing the "density" of music, so that >> one could write >> \layout { \horizontalSpacingLoose } >> and it woul

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread PMA
David Kastrup wrote: PMA writes: David Kastrup wrote: PMA writes: Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a factor of #-1

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread David Kastrup
PMA writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> PMA writes: >> >>> Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a factor of

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 14.09.2013 20:54, schrieb David Kastrup: PMA writes: Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a factor of #-1.0 would mean t

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread PMA
David Kastrup wrote: PMA writes: Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a factor of #-1.0 would mean that the glyphs are engr

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread David Kastrup
PMA writes: > Jim Long wrote: >> I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 >> means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs >> would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and >> a factor of #-1.0 would mean that the glyphs are engraved >> nor

Re: Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread PMA
Jim Long wrote: I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0 means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and a factor of #-1.0 would mean that the glyphs are engraved normally, but spaced right-to-le

Proposed horizontal spacing adjustment [was Re: film score example]

2013-09-14 Thread Jim Long
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:14:55PM +0200, Janek Warcho?? wrote: > > I think that we should add to LilyPond a simple, user-friendly > interface that would allow choosing the "density" of music, so that > one could write > \layout { \horizontalSpacingLoose } > and it would result in common-shortest-