Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/704/#64b9
> has an image of the relevant Gould-page.
>
> ölkjh
>
>
> […]
>
> Though, I'll not start the work if Torsten will present a proper fix
> within the next two weeks.
>
> […]
>
> Torsten, what do you think?
Hi Ha
Am Fr., 10. Apr. 2020 um 14:34 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave
:
>
> On 4/9/20, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-04/msg00160.html
> > It's ofcourse a workaround, but usable, afaict.
>
> Could it be worth mentioning on the tracker page for
> #704/#3143/
On 4/9/20, Thomas Morley wrote:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-04/msg00160.html
> It's ofcourse a workaround, but usable, afaict.
Could it be worth mentioning on the tracker page for #704/#3143/#318/whichever?
Cheers,
V.
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> see my code at
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-04/msg00160.html
>
> It's ofcourse a workaround, but usable, afaict.
Hi Harm,
It's good to have a workaround for the time being.
The reason why I haven't finished the "strange gap behaviour" issue 586
Am Sa., 28. März 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Torsten Hämmerle
:
>
> Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> > [...] attempting to make whole-note-tremolo-beams avoid possible Dots to
> > the
> > left and possible Accidentals to the right.
>
>
> Yes, that would certainly be the next step. Avoiding dots and accidenta
Noeck wrote
> You always show notes with the same pitch. It might
> make sense to look at slanted beams, too. But as there is no problem
> currently, I would not expect one due to the gap change.
Musically, two-note tremolos with twice the same note don't make any sense
at all, but for demonstrati
Hi Torsten,
Am 28.03.20 um 16:55 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
> Only for non-zero gaps, the gap will start at the inside of stems
That sounds fine. You always show notes with the same pitch. It might
make sense to look at slanted beams, too. But as there is no problem
currently, I would not expect o
Noeck wrote
> I would also expect the "gap" to be the free space between stem and beam.
Hi Joram,
Thank you, then we seem to have a common understanding of "gap", even if the
current tremolo beam gap implementation behaves differently.
Noeck wrote
> In your attached image, I wonder if you have
Hi Torsten,
> *What do you think?*
> Wouldn't it be better to have "gap" actually mean "free space"?
I would also expect the "gap" to be the free space between stem and beam.
In your attached image, I wonder if you have drawn the upper beam from
the inner edge of the stem only for demonstration
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> [...] attempting to make whole-note-tremolo-beams avoid possible Dots to
> the
> left and possible Accidentals to the right.
Yes, that would certainly be the next step. Avoiding dots and accidentals.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com
Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 18:35 Uhr schrieb Torsten Hämmerle
:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Looking more deeply into Harm's strange whole-note tremolo beam gap
> behaviour, I've stumbled over the current gap implementation:
>
> It's probably rather academic, but my understanding of "gap size" is the
> actual
Hello all,
Looking more deeply into Harm's strange whole-note tremolo beam gap
behaviour, I've stumbled over the current gap implementation:
It's probably rather academic, but my understanding of "gap size" is the
actual gap size (white space) between two objects.
Looking at the current implemen
12 matches
Mail list logo
