In the GDP docs, this issue is mentioned both in the sections on
"Instrument transpositions" and "Quoting other voices". Do you
think it needs further clarification?
/Mats
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 4. März 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
2008/3/3, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PR
Am Dienstag, 4. März 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> 2008/3/3, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm currently investigating how to properly write transposing
> > instruments. Since their voices are also used in cue notes, the best way
> > is to write them
>
> I don't understand this rem
2008/3/3, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm currently investigating how to properly write transposing instruments.
> Since their voices are also used in cue notes, the best way is to write them
I don't understand this remark: this is exactly why we have the
\transposition feature; why
I'm currently investigating how to properly write transposing instruments.
Since their voices are also used in cue notes, the best way is to write them
in concert pitch (so the cue notes are automatically correct), and use
\transpose from to ... only for the staff contents.
However, the problem
