With help from the Guile users group (thanks to Germán Arias & Chris Vine)
I installed Guile 2.0.11. The reported problem persists. I can run L-pond
(as
long as I do not try anything difficult) (still version 2.18.2) but I
cannot debug.
The tiny test x.ly fails with the same error.
__
Mark,
> Then I downloaded Guile 2.0.11 from the gnu.org website and tried to build
> it.
> Configure failed (also off topic).
This step is tells you that there is a dependency problem, and that guile
2.0.11, which is _very_ _very_ stable :), won't compile, don't even try :)
If you can't find o
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> There's your mistake. curried-definitions is broken. You need 2.0.10
> at least.
Ah. The releases in the ftp directory end up being sorted
alphabetically so I mistakenly assumed the one furthest down in the
list was the latest. You're stil
mark damerell writes:
> Thank you who replied. I think I should explain some background: I was
> trying to write a template which has bugs. (off-topic, I hope to
> post a new thread on "handbells").
>
> I got the exact same error with Guile 1.8.8+1-6ubuntu2
> Then I removed that and installed Gu
Thank you who replied. I think I should explain some background: I was
trying to write a template which has bugs. (off-topic, I hope to
post a new thread on "handbells").
I got the exact same error with Guile 1.8.8+1-6ubuntu2
Then I removed that and installed Guile 2.0.5+1-1
In general Lilypond s
Jay Anderson writes:
> ... Modify configure.ac to use 2.0.9 instead.
> The first thing I noticed is that the nested define shorthand wasn't
> working in many places (even with (use-modules '(ice-9
> curried-definitions))' in lily.scm).
There's your mistake. curried-definitions is broken. You
You could upgrade to 14.4 it is yet another LTS version. and there
LilyPond 2.18 works well.
The only downside I am noticing at the moment is Chrome browser is in
a bad spot they are migrating their gtk widgets to something else and
it will be another few weeks before that is complete.
Shane
On T
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Am 22.05.2014 22:36, schrieb rm damerell:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I have a problem due (I think) to a bad mixture of
>> versions of Lilypond and Guile. Versions are:
>> L-Ubuntu 12.04
>> guile-2.0.5+1-1 (most recent version I found in
Am 22.05.2014 22:36, schrieb rm damerell:
Dear colleagues,
I have a problem due (I think) to a bad mixture of
versions of Lilypond and Guile. Versions are:
L-Ubuntu 12.04
guile-2.0.5+1-1 (most recent version I found in Ubuntu repository)
Lilypond 2.18.2 (From lilypond.org)
Lilypond still wor
Dear colleagues,
I have a problem due (I think) to a bad mixture of
versions of Lilypond and Guile. Versions are:
L-Ubuntu 12.04
guile-2.0.5+1-1 (most recent version I found in Ubuntu repository)
Lilypond 2.18.2 (From lilypond.org)
I wrote a test file, x.ly:
BEGIN
\version "2.18.2"
\in
10 matches
Mail list logo
