On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I believe the highest bounty so far was 250 euro, back in the days
> when Han-Wen was working full-time and Trevor Baca was requesting many
> new features.
FTR -- The highest bounty I ever paid was 500 euros, in 2007.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010
Op dinsdag 15-06-2010 om 16:50 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
> I really cannot recall seeing any offers of "thousands of Euros". If
> they're still valid offers, please send info to bug-lilypond.
> That has been attempted before... hmm, 2007? Han-Wen tried to work on
> lilypond
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> This is not what we are saying in our presentation and/or paper.
> What we are saying is: "We attempted a publication of a major critical
> edition through a major publishing house, using software from a volunteer
> open-source project with
On 6/13/10 9:17 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
>
>> If there are other patches that are not yet up to
>> LilyPond status, but might be able to get there, it would be nice to have
>> them listed as issues with patches attached.
>
> I suppose a starting point could be to look at the patches al
Am Sonntag, 13. Juni 2010, um 16:55:01 schrieben Sie:
> May I suggest that "Publisher-Grade" is perhaps a misnomer? This makes it
> sound like we can't produce *any* publisher-grade music without footnotes,
> or endnotes, or widow/orphan control. Perhaps an adjustment to the title
> to "Publisher
On 6/13/10 12:02 AM, "Boris Shingarov" wrote:
> Hi Graham and all Lilyponders,
>
> I was quite astonished to hear that my slides were understood to mean anything
> pessimistic or negative. If they give people this impression, then it is a
> defect of the slides which I will fix.
>
> But rig
On 13 June 2010 07:02, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> "Your post is absolutely unnecessary"
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg52334.html
That comment wasn't directed at Jiříi; it was part of a reply to David Kastrup.
Regards,
Neil
___
Hi Graham and all Lilyponders,
I was quite astonished to hear that my slides were understood to mean
anything pessimistic or negative. If they give people this impression,
then it is a defect of the slides which I will fix.
But right now, let me address some of the apparent misunderstandings
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> 2010/6/11 Boris Shingarov :
>
> > The slides are now online at
> > http://www.shingarov.com/lily
>
> I also found the last slides a bit too "pessimistic"...
>
> But anyway, it's nice that people talk about LilyPond ; if we make
>
I look forward to the article with great anticipation; it'll be
interesting to see how you justify the conclusions in the last few
slides.
Other than that, there isn't much one can say - no argument is put
forward, just a series of statements.
Good luck
-Mike
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Bor
2010/6/11 Boris Shingarov :
> The slides are now online at
> http://www.shingarov.com/lily
I also found the last slides a bit too "pessimistic"...
But anyway, it's nice that people talk about LilyPond ; if we make
people discover it, maybe in those people we will find some useful
developers to c
Am Freitag, 11. Juni 2010, um 22:00:21 schrieb Boris Shingarov:
> > And for those who cannot make it or are too lazy
> > to travel to Canada, will your presentation or
> > paper be available online?
>
> The slides are now online at
> http://www.shingarov.com/lily
Some comments:
-) Flowing text w
Am Samstag, 12. Juni 2010, um 16:39:45 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Oh, and I hope that this "paper to appear" includes an excellent
> reason why you didn't use lilypond-book and LaTeX, which unlike
> lilypond itself is *designed* to mix music and text.
Ahm, I completely understand a decision NOT to
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>>> And for those who cannot make it or are too lazy
>>> to travel to Canada, will your presentation or
>>> paper be available online?
>>
>> The slides are now online at
>> http://www
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>> And for those who cannot make it or are too lazy
>> to travel to Canada, will your presentation or
>> paper be available online?
>
> The slides are now online at
> http://www.shingarov.com/lily
Are you seriously going to submit a paper to
> And for those who cannot make it or are too lazy
> to travel to Canada, will your presentation or
> paper be available online?
The slides are now online at
http://www.shingarov.com/lily
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://list
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the kind words, -- it's good to have the presentation is
blessed by the Founding Father.
And for those who cannot make it or are too lazy
to travel to Canada, will your presentation or
paper be available online?
Yes. Of course, I will put the slides up for everyone,
Op woensdag 02-06-2010 om 22:50 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Boris
Shingarov:
> I will be giving a presentation called "Publisher-grade LilyPond"
> The presentation is about our experiences using
> LilyPond to publish a critical edition of 16th century
> Gregorian chant.
> Everyone is welcome to
I will be giving a presentation called "Publisher-grade LilyPond"
at the next meeting of the Ottawa Linux Users Group
(this coming Thursday), in Ottawa, Canada.
The presentation is about our experiences using
LilyPond to publish a critical edition of 16th century
Gregorian chant.
Everyone is welcom
19 matches
Mail list logo
